<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Quebec politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/quebec-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Marois backtracks on some cuts to research funding in Quebec</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/marois-backtracks-on-some-cuts-to-research-funding-in-quebec/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/marois-backtracks-on-some-cuts-to-research-funding-in-quebec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=350380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QUEBEC &#8211; The Parti Quebecois minority government, which has been forced to retreat on...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/marois-backtracks-on-some-cuts-to-research-funding-in-quebec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	QUEBEC &#8211; The Parti Quebecois minority government, which has been forced to retreat on...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does being in politics mean never having to say you&#8217;re sorry?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/09/does-being-in-politics-mean-never-having-to-say-youre-sorry/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/09/does-being-in-politics-mean-never-having-to-say-youre-sorry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonhomme Carnaval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charbonneau commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gérald Tremblay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's cover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quebec corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=312458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two years after our cover story provoked a defensive uproar, evidence of the deep-seated corruption has continued to pile up]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/09/does-being-in-politics-mean-never-having-to-say-youre-sorry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Two years after our cover story provoked a defensive uproar, evidence of the deep-seated corruption has continued to pile up
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parti Quebecois will table budget early to avoid minority defeat</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/05/parti-quebecois-will-table-budget-early-to-avoid-minority-defeat/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/05/parti-quebecois-will-table-budget-early-to-avoid-minority-defeat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=311401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QUEBEC &#8211; The newly elected Parti Quebecois government will seek to protect itself against...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/05/parti-quebecois-will-table-budget-early-to-avoid-minority-defeat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	QUEBEC &#8211; The newly elected Parti Quebecois government will seek to protect itself against...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jean Charest&#8217;s buddies in bad times</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/still-buddies-in-bad-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/still-buddies-in-bad-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charbonneau commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=306838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the corruption scandal rages on, Liberals can't seem to get enough of their tainted former leader]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/still-buddies-in-bad-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	While the corruption scandal rages on, Liberals can't seem to get enough of their tainted former leader
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PQ accomplishes the impossible—makes life easy for Liberals</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/pq-accomplishes-the-impossible-makes-life-easy-for-liberals/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/pq-accomplishes-the-impossible-makes-life-easy-for-liberals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill 101]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charbonneau commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Marceau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=305724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marois has already overplayed her hand and completely misread the population she claims to represent]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/pq-accomplishes-the-impossible-makes-life-easy-for-liberals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Marois has already overplayed her hand and completely misread the population she claims to represent
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raymond Bachand, architect of tuition hikes, enters Quebec Liberal leadership race</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/28/raymond-bachand-architect-of-tuition-hikes-enters-quebec-liberal-leadership-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/28/raymond-bachand-architect-of-tuition-hikes-enters-quebec-liberal-leadership-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=298002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MONTREAL &#8211; The race to succeed Jean Charest has its first prominent participant as...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/28/raymond-bachand-architect-of-tuition-hikes-enters-quebec-liberal-leadership-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	MONTREAL &#8211; The race to succeed Jean Charest has its first prominent participant as...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PQ makes good on tuition promise and scraps the Liberal fee hikes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/20/pq-makes-good-on-tuition-promise-and-scraps-the-liberal-fee-hikes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/20/pq-makes-good-on-tuition-promise-and-scraps-the-liberal-fee-hikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=295818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QUEBEC &#8211; It&#8217;s over — the tuition increase that triggered such social strife in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/20/pq-makes-good-on-tuition-promise-and-scraps-the-liberal-fee-hikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	QUEBEC &#8211; It&#8217;s over — the tuition increase that triggered such social strife in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marois to pursue a strong, sovereigntist agenda</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/20/marois-to-pursue-a-strong-sovereigntist-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/20/marois-to-pursue-a-strong-sovereigntist-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=295561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quebec Premier Pauline Marois may have a minority government, but she has an ambitious...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/20/marois-to-pursue-a-strong-sovereigntist-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Quebec Premier Pauline Marois may have a minority government, but she has an ambitious...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smart, tough and nasty: the definitive portrait of Thomas Mulcair</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/19/the-fights-of-his-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/19/the-fights-of-his-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilingualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Co-operative Commonwealth Federation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McGill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanier College]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=292643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on the NDP leader's rise through the ruthless world of Quebec politics to become the PM’s toughest opponent yet]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/19/the-fights-of-his-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on the NDP leader's rise through the ruthless world of Quebec politics to become the PM’s toughest opponent yet
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mulcair so far: the outtakes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/mulcair-so-far-outtakes-from-this-weeks-profile/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/mulcair-so-far-outtakes-from-this-weeks-profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=293112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on what didn't make it into this week's cover story on the controversial politician]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/mulcair-so-far-outtakes-from-this-weeks-profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on what didn't make it into this week's cover story on the controversial politician
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>François Legault to the rescue</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/18/to-the-rescue/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/18/to-the-rescue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition avenir quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[François Legault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/24/to-the-rescue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the former airline exec, Quebecers are once again looking for a political saviour]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/18/to-the-rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In the former airline exec, Quebecers are once again looking for a political saviour
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are voters finally fed up with Jean Charest&#8217;s flip-flops?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/17/premier-flip-flop/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/17/premier-flip-flop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/20/premier-flip-flop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Quebec premier tends to reverse himself only after incurring maximum political damage]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/17/premier-flip-flop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Quebec premier tends to reverse himself only after incurring maximum political damage
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;There isn&#8217;t a crazy appetite for sovereignty&#8221;—Pauline Marois</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/26/there-isnt-a-huge-appetite-for-sovereignty%e2%80%94pauline-marois/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/26/there-isnt-a-huge-appetite-for-sovereignty%e2%80%94pauline-marois/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[François Legault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=211883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My colleague Alec Castonguay, who toils over at our sister publication L&#8217;actualité, posted a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/26/there-isnt-a-huge-appetite-for-sovereignty%e2%80%94pauline-marois/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	My colleague Alec Castonguay, who toils over at our sister publication L&#8217;actualité, posted a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gohier vs. Patriquin on the splintering of Quebec&#8217;s sovereigntist movement</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/19/gohier-vs-patriquin-on-the-splintering-of-quebecs-sovereigntist-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/19/gohier-vs-patriquin-on-the-splintering-of-quebecs-sovereigntist-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manifesto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nouveau mouvement pour le Québec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separatists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereigntist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=210708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the Nouveau mouvement pour le Québec have a political future?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/19/gohier-vs-patriquin-on-the-splintering-of-quebecs-sovereigntist-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Does the Nouveau mouvement pour le Québec have a political future?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the PQ, independence starts at home</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/inside-the-pq-independence-evidently-starts-at-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/inside-the-pq-independence-evidently-starts-at-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benoit Charette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=198579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another MNA quits the Parti Québécois over its referendum policy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/inside-the-pq-independence-evidently-starts-at-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Yet another MNA quits the Parti Québécois over its referendum policy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quebecers have more backbone than the politicians in Ottawa</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/14/quebecers-have-more-backbone/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/14/quebecers-have-more-backbone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=151281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears Quebecers agree that Quebec is most corrupt province in Canada]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/14/quebecers-have-more-backbone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It appears Quebecers agree that Quebec is most corrupt province in Canada
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marc Bellemare remembers the sponsorship scandal (or does he?)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/25/marc-bellemare-remembers-the-sponsorship-scandal-or-does-he/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/25/marc-bellemare-remembers-the-sponsorship-scandal-or-does-he/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bastarache inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Bellemare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=144100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the most impressive part of Marc Bellemare&#8217;s testimony at the Bastarache commission is...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/25/marc-bellemare-remembers-the-sponsorship-scandal-or-does-he/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Perhaps the most impressive part of Marc Bellemare&#8217;s testimony at the Bastarache commission is...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything you ever wanted to know about Axor&#039;s illegal donations in Quebec (but were afraid to ask)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/10/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-axors-illegal-donations-in-quebec-but-were-afraid-to-ask/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/10/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-axors-illegal-donations-in-quebec-but-were-afraid-to-ask/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[axor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=142066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last week, Quebec&#8217;s Directeur général des élections (DGE) announced it had uncovered forty...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/10/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-axors-illegal-donations-in-quebec-but-were-afraid-to-ask/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Late last week, Quebec&#8217;s Directeur général des élections (DGE) announced it had uncovered forty...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even Liberals don’t like the Charest government</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/20/even-liberals-dont-like-the-charest-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/20/even-liberals-dont-like-the-charest-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=139313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has the provincial party bottomed out in Quebec?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/20/even-liberals-dont-like-the-charest-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Has the provincial party bottomed out in Quebec?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charest&#039;s credibility gap</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/15/charests-credibility-gap/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/15/charests-credibility-gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel Bellemare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=120787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why it's getting harder and harder to give him the benefit of the doubt]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/15/charests-credibility-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	Why it's getting harder and harder to give him the benefit of the doubt
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gilles Duceppe: Coming to a city near you</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/10/gilles-duceppe-coming-to-a-city-near-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/10/gilles-duceppe-coming-to-a-city-near-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=119785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, "it'd be way easier if Quebec wasn’t around"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/10/gilles-duceppe-coming-to-a-city-near-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
	Sometimes, "it'd be way easier if Quebec wasn’t around"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paging Dr. Freud</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/28/paging-dr-freud/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/28/paging-dr-freud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Boulet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Courchesne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norman MacMillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=112847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are provincial cabinet ministers in Quebec trying to tell us something?
Transportation Minister Julie...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/28/paging-dr-freud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	Are provincial cabinet ministers in Quebec trying to tell us something?
Transportation Minister Julie...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where would you cut to balance the budget?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/22/where-would-you-cut-to-balance-the-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/22/where-would-you-cut-to-balance-the-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=103487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t yet read John&#8217;s piece about how difficult it&#8217;s going to be...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/22/where-would-you-cut-to-balance-the-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
	If you haven&#8217;t yet read John&#8217;s piece about how difficult it&#8217;s going to be...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#039;s the Bloc, and then there&#039;s everyone else</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/20/theres-the-bloc-and-then-theres-everyone-else/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/20/theres-the-bloc-and-then-theres-everyone-else/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=102688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Léger Marketing released the results of its latest poll into the political leanings of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/20/theres-the-bloc-and-then-theres-everyone-else/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	Léger Marketing released the results of its latest poll into the political leanings of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jean Charest and the burden of being amazing</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/12/jean-charest-and-the-burden-of-being-amazing/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/12/jean-charest-and-the-burden-of-being-amazing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salut bonjour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=101011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Gazette&#8216;s Don Macpherson boldly predicts 2010 won&#8217;t be all wine and roses for...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/12/jean-charest-and-the-burden-of-being-amazing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	The Gazette&#8216;s Don Macpherson boldly predicts 2010 won&#8217;t be all wine and roses for...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this what a post-nationalist Quebec looks like?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/04/is-this-what-a-post-nationalist-quebec-looks-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/04/is-this-what-a-post-nationalist-quebec-looks-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 in review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=99599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December 2008, just after Jean Charest&#8217;s third consecutive election victory, I wrote this:...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/04/is-this-what-a-post-nationalist-quebec-looks-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	In December 2008, just after Jean Charest&#8217;s third consecutive election victory, I wrote this:...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The three-candidate circus</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/15/the-three-candidate-circus/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/15/the-three-candidate-circus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADQ leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Lévesque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Éric Caire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Taillon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What would Mario Dumont do?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=81758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short of culminating in a Three Stooges-esque slap fight at the final candidates&#8217; debate,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/15/the-three-candidate-circus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Short of culminating in a Three Stooges-esque slap fight at the final candidates&#8217; debate,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The mystery of Jean Charest</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/26/the-mystery-of-jean-charest/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/26/the-mystery-of-jean-charest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=77424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a word for businesses whose fortunes don&#8217;t conform to dominant patterns, outfits like...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/26/the-mystery-of-jean-charest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	There&#8217;s a word for businesses whose fortunes don&#8217;t conform to dominant patterns, outfits like...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the Tories need to do in Quebec</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/14/what-the-tories-need-to-do-in-quebec/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/14/what-the-tories-need-to-do-in-quebec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives in Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=68665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For starters, Stephen Harper may need to share the spotlight]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/14/what-the-tories-need-to-do-in-quebec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
	For starters, Stephen Harper may need to share the spotlight
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/03/quote-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/03/quote-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=68595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arnold Kling isn&#8217;t referring specifically to Quebec, but he might as well be:
The...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/03/quote-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	Arnold Kling isn&#8217;t referring specifically to Quebec, but he might as well be:
The...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget bribing Quebecers with their own money, scare them instead</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/29/forget-bribing-quebecers-with-their-own-money-scare-them-instead/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/29/forget-bribing-quebecers-with-their-own-money-scare-them-instead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clueless ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives in Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tough on crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=67927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess the Conservatives figure they can&#8217;t do much worse in Quebec so they...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/29/forget-bribing-quebecers-with-their-own-money-scare-them-instead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
	I guess the Conservatives figure they can&#8217;t do much worse in Quebec so they...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who doesn&#039;t like a good constitutional crisis once in a while?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/11/who-doesnt-like-a-good-constitutional-crisis-once-in-a-while/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/11/who-doesnt-like-a-good-constitutional-crisis-once-in-a-while/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectuels pour la souveraineté]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Parizeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sectoral referenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereigntists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=63778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[vodpod id=ExternalVideo.836782&#38;w=425&#38;h=350&#38;fv=]
Here&#8217;s that video of Jacques Parizeau telling the &#8220;Intellectuals for sovereignty&#8221;—yes, that&#8217;s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/11/who-doesnt-like-a-good-constitutional-crisis-once-in-a-while/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	[vodpod id=ExternalVideo.836782&#38;w=425&#38;h=350&#38;fv=]
Here&#8217;s that video of Jacques Parizeau telling the &#8220;Intellectuals for sovereignty&#8221;—yes, that&#8217;s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>About those attack ads</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/19/about-those-attack-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/19/about-those-attack-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff is a snob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tory culture wars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=58139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I happen to like attack ads. The anti-Dion gambit, for example, was as effective...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/19/about-those-attack-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
	I happen to like attack ads. The anti-Dion gambit, for example, was as effective...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coalition fever: The swine flu of 2008</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/30/coalition-fever-the-swine-flu-of-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/30/coalition-fever-the-swine-flu-of-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action Democratique du Québec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Dumont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=53846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just try to imagine the hand-wringing this would&#8217;ve caused across Canada: A Bloc-supported coalition...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/30/coalition-fever-the-swine-flu-of-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	Just try to imagine the hand-wringing this would&#8217;ve caused across Canada: A Bloc-supported coalition...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>So, Stephen, which one&#039;s the half?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/21/so-stephen-which-ones-the-half/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/21/so-stephen-which-ones-the-half/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1995 referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=51389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#8217;t it fun that both the current opposition and government leaders were doing interviews...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/21/so-stephen-which-ones-the-half/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	Isn&#8217;t it fun that both the current opposition and government leaders were doing interviews...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignore your problems, and they just might go away</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/20/ignore-your-problems-and-they-just-might-go-away/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/20/ignore-your-problems-and-they-just-might-go-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monique Jérôme-Forget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=44716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;If there are any economists in the room, you&#8217;re no good,&#8221; Monique Jérôme-Forget told...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/20/ignore-your-problems-and-they-just-might-go-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
	&#8220;If there are any economists in the room, you&#8217;re no good,&#8221; Monique Jérôme-Forget told...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How &#039;bout them fixed election dates, eh?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/10/how-bout-them-fixed-election-dates-eh/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/10/how-bout-them-fixed-election-dates-eh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caisse de depot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixed election dates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=42366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Harper and Jean Charest have to be glad they got their respective re-elections...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/10/how-bout-them-fixed-election-dates-eh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	Stephen Harper and Jean Charest have to be glad they got their respective re-elections...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the budget means for Quebec</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/30/what-the-budget-means-for-quebec/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/30/what-the-budget-means-for-quebec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=32146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Budget day brought mostly bad news for the province: The cap on equalization stayed...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/30/what-the-budget-means-for-quebec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
	Budget day brought mostly bad news for the province: The cap on equalization stayed...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who wants to lead the ADQ? No one.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/21/who-wants-to-lead-the-adq-no-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/21/who-wants-to-lead-the-adq-no-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADQ leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the ADQ survive to fight again without Mario Dumont?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/21/who-wants-to-lead-the-adq-no-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Will the ADQ survive to fight again without Mario Dumont?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Montcalm v. Wolfe: I thought everyone knew how it ended</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/16/montcalm-v-wolfe-i-thought-everyone-knew-how-it-ended/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/16/montcalm-v-wolfe-i-thought-everyone-knew-how-it-ended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plains of abraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-enactments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock'em sock'em federalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=28869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve always found re-enacting historical battles to be among the goofiest hobbies a person...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/16/montcalm-v-wolfe-i-thought-everyone-knew-how-it-ended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	I&#8217;ve always found re-enacting historical battles to be among the goofiest hobbies a person...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>And a happy new year to you</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/09/and-a-happy-new-year-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/09/and-a-happy-new-year-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bye Bye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=26809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed&#8217;s note: We&#8217;ve been on hiatus for much of December, as DMA bought itself...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/09/and-a-happy-new-year-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Ed&#8217;s note: We&#8217;ve been on hiatus for much of December, as DMA bought itself...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adios, Super Mario (and other scattered thoughts about the election)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/11/adios-super-mario-and-other-scattered-thoughts-about-the-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/11/adios-super-mario-and-other-scattered-thoughts-about-the-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Dumont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=23648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few (more) final thoughts on the election:
1) I have a nagging feeling...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/11/adios-super-mario-and-other-scattered-thoughts-about-the-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	A few (more) final thoughts on the election:
1) I have a nagging feeling...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liveblogging the Quebec election returns</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/08/liveblogging-the-quebec-election-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/08/liveblogging-the-quebec-election-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liveblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Dumont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=23193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charest wins a majority. Dumont resigns.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/08/liveblogging-the-quebec-election-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
	Charest wins a majority. Dumont resigns.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A fearless election prediction</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/08/a-fearless-election-prediction/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/08/a-fearless-election-prediction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Dumont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=23155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finished dead last in the office election prediction pool in 2007, so take...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/08/a-fearless-election-prediction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	I finished dead last in the office election prediction pool in 2007, so take...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>By the numbers: How the PQ can win the election</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/05/by-the-numbers-how-the-pq-can-win-the-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/05/by-the-numbers-how-the-pq-can-win-the-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=22357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the anti-sovereignist backlash floating around these days, wouldn&#8217;t it be a kick...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/05/by-the-numbers-how-the-pq-can-win-the-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	With all the anti-sovereignist backlash floating around these days, wouldn&#8217;t it be a kick...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
