Head of the household
By Rachel Mendleson - Monday, March 15, 2010 - 0 Comments
More women are now prime family earners, but wage gaps persist
The past few years have been difficult for Brian and Karen Rae. After working at K Tool & Die for more than a decade, Brian, 62, was laid off from the Oakville, Ont., plant, which made parts for the auto industry, in December 2008. At the time, Brian, who had been a toolmaker for 38 years, was earning about $58,000—a decent salary, he says, but not enough to live comfortably. “You can’t make it on one family income anymore.” As such, Karen has long worked full-time at Zellers, where she earns less than $20,000 a year assisting customers in the men’s department. The importance of her job has been “brought to the forefront” since he lost his, says Brian, along with the fact that surviving on it alone is impossible. While he completes a government-funded course in home renovation (he gave up on toolmaking after distributing 100 resumés to no avail), they’ve had to dip into their RRSPs. “It’s been a bit of a struggle to keep up with everything,” he says.
As Ottawa celebrates the country’s official return to economic growth, the Raes are not the only ones for whom recovery remains an abstract notion. Dubbed the “man-cession” or “he-session” for the way in which it snuffed out male-dominated manufacturing jobs, the downturn has dramatically altered the dynamic of many working class families. According to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, men suffered 76 per cent of the overall job losses; Statistics Canada numbers show that in 2009, male employment levels dipped by a total of 249,000 over the previous year, compared to a decline of 28,000 for women.
The reality today is that a middle class existence, more often than not, means a two-income family, with more women assuming the role of primary breadwinner than ever before. But a stubborn fact, buried under decades of gender equality and diversity training, has resurfaced: despite comprising more than half the workforce and outpacing the educational achievements of men, women still make less. What’s happened since the recession, says Barb Byers, executive vice-president of the Canadian Labour Congress, “is the men have looked [at what their wives are earning] and said, ‘Wait a minute, these are really crappy jobs. You can’t feed a family on this.’ ” It’s a reality that, when combined with the downturn and the shrinking middle class, is wreaking havoc on family finances.
-
An empty, almost flippant budget
By Andrew Coyne - Thursday, March 4, 2010 at 5:11 PM - 178 Comments
Let’s get the good news out of the way first. The unilateral elimination of all remaining tariffs on production inputs in today’s budget is terrific public policy, a shot in the arm for Canada’s manufacturers, and a timely example to the rest of the world. It will lower costs, save on paperwork, and improve productivity. It will make Canada the G20’s first tariff-free zone, and as such is likely to prove an attractive incentive to locate a plant here.End of good news.
The rest is simply bewildering. It was to be expected the budget would be inadequate; nothing suggested it would be quite so trivial as this. A merely inadequate budget would have made no cuts in spending in the coming year, notwithstanding a deficit projected at $54-billion, but would have pencilled in cuts in succeeding years. If it were really inadequate, it would have left these mostly unspecified, leaving skinflint critics like me to splutter at the vagueness of it all. We’ll believe it when we see it, we’d say, in the pleasant anticipation of the scathing articles we would write about next year’s budget, when the government would once again fail to deliver on cuts — the economy is still just a little too fragile, it would claim, again — pushing off the day of reckoning yet another year into the future. Continue…
-
Today
By Aaron Wherry - Thursday, March 4, 2010 at 12:49 PM - 10 Comments
So here is how budget day will work at Macleans.ca.
At this very moment, our Paul Wells, Andrew Coyne, John Geddes and Philippe Gohier are sequestered in a downtown Ottawa conference room with various other journalists, bureaucrats and government officials, scrutinizing at length the federal budget. They will be freed at 4pm and will burst forth with all sorts of news and analysis. So you have only to hold your breath for another three hours.
I, possessing only rudimentary math skills, am not in the lock-up and am instead skipping joyfully around the capital, delighting in the freedom of movement that is allowed when most everyone else is being held captive. I’ll be in the House for Question Period at 2pm, in the foyer for scrums afterward and then back in my seat for the budget speech by Jim Flaherty at 4pm. Some sort of written account will follow.
-
The Commons: Don’t get your hopes up and you won’t be disappointed
By Aaron Wherry - Wednesday, March 3, 2010 at 7:45 PM - 19 Comments
A mere 58 minutes. That’s it. That’s all.
We were promised an hour, perhaps as much as an hour and a half. And yet here was Michaëlle Jean, solemnly invoking “Divine Providence” at precisely 3:47pm this afternoon, just about 58 minutes after she welcomed “honourable senators, members of the House of Commons, ladies and gentlemen.”
Some 6,000 words passed in between, each delivered in that breathy, deliberate way of the Governor General’s. But this was not quite the excruciating test of endurance for speaker and listener alike, not nearly the epic we were told to expect. Once more we are faced with a government full of ambition and promise, unable to ultimately deliver. Once again we see the danger of unrestrained hope. Continue…
-
It took two months of recalibrating and consulting to decide to do nothing?
By Aaron Wherry - Tuesday, February 23, 2010 at 11:47 AM - 14 Comments
For a sneak preview of this year’s budget, please consult last year’s budget.
The upcoming federal budget will contain no new spending measures or tax cuts beyond what the Harper government has announced already in its plan to stimulate the economy, says a senior government official. The budget, to be tabled on March 4, will simply implement the second year of the “economic action plan,” the stimulus package unveiled in last year’s budget, the official told reporters in a briefing Monday.
The Star finds a government official who suggests there will indeed be spending cuts, but another government official—conceivably the same one cited by Canwest—speaks only to a reduction in the rate of growth of government spending. Economists, wordsmiths and fans of financial terminology can debate the difference, if any, between those two statements.
No word yet on whether the government, entering into an era of restraint, will cut down on the number of unnamed officials it employs.
-
A terrorist trial with a silver lining
By Chris Sorensen - Thursday, February 11, 2010 - 0 Comments
-
Awash in a sea of debt
By Jason Kirby - Tuesday, February 2, 2010 - 34 Comments
-
‘Accountability, ladies and gentlemen, is the prerequisite for progress’
By Aaron Wherry - Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 3:34 PM - 40 Comments
The prepared text of the Prime Minister’s speech in Davos today.
“It’s great to be here in Davos and to have this opportunity to contribute to your discussions on some of the vital issues confronting the world today. Some of them are complex and they may, at times, seem abstract. But for ordinary men and women everywhere, the substance of what we talk about here translates into simple realities like a home, food on the table, or a better life for their children. So, it’s an important debate that we’re delighted to be part of.
-
Detroit’s dirty secret: SUVs rule
By Jason Kirby - Thursday, January 28, 2010 - 1 Comment
-
Voice of Fire: Are we over this yet?
By John Geddes - Thursday, January 21, 2010 - 16 Comments
-
Prorogue nation
By Aaron Wherry - Wednesday, January 6, 2010 at 11:47 AM - 33 Comments
Glen Pearson leaves for Africa with much on his mind.
Like many reading this blog, I’ve done a lot of thinking over the present prorogation of Parliament and I presume I’m in the vanguard of those who are deeply troubled by the development. Yet in so many ways, Canada has been prorogued for years. Suspending or cancelling our international commitment to Africa is bad enough, but where also is our commitment to battling climate change, or how could we spend so abundantly with no plan in place for how we pay it off? While our Aboriginal communities still suffer from our prorogation of the human spirit, this country yet refuses to sign the UN’s Declaration of Aboriginal Rights. We went AWOL on medical isotopes and have done absolutely nothing to deal with the emerging healthcare crisis already at our doorstep. Child poverty is roughly what it was 20 years ago and we still haven’t figured out what our development plans look like as we leave Afghanistan.
Heck, this country has been in prorogation for a long time, enough that it might be time to worry that it’s becoming part of our collective DNA. In our inability and lack of maturity surrounding minority government, we take the kind of incremental steps that lead to … nothing. Parliamentarians sit fewer days in the House than ever before and these significant issues lie in wait for someone to use power for anything other than the desire to hold on to it.
-
Peter and Stephen
By Aaron Wherry - Wednesday, January 6, 2010 at 8:35 AM - 16 Comments
-
The city of gold turns to dust
By Anne Kingston - Wednesday, December 16, 2009 - 15 Comments
-
Econowatch
By Jason Kirby - Friday, December 11, 2009 - 4 Comments











