<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Republican Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/republican-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:31:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Brain surgeon, Hollywood inspiration — and the next Republican hope</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/01/just-what-the-doctor-ordered/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/01/just-what-the-doctor-ordered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savage Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Carson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans eye neurosurgeon Benjamin Carson]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/01/just-what-the-doctor-ordered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Republicans eye neurosurgeon Benjamin Carson
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Gulp: Republican insiders try to save the party from itself</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/big-gulp/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/big-gulp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP needs to rethink outreach in order to stop "secular socialism"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/big-gulp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The GOP needs to rethink outreach in order to stop "secular socialism"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans hit unions where it hurts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/15/hitting-them-where-it-hurts/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/15/hitting-them-where-it-hurts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Weinman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Legislative Exchange Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right-to-work law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=335073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-to-work laws target the same labour unions that helped fund Obama's victory]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/15/hitting-them-where-it-hurts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Right-to-work laws target the same labour unions that helped fund Obama's victory
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans divided over Taxpayer Protection Pledge as fiscal cliff looms</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/grover-not-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/grover-not-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans for Tax Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=323941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Zealot' Grover Norquist continues rally against taxes]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/grover-not-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'Zealot' Grover Norquist continues rally against taxes
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican soul-searching for 2016</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/20/republican-soul-searching-for-2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/20/republican-soul-searching-for-2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=316937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Losing an election you were certain to win is never easy. Up against a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/20/republican-soul-searching-for-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Losing an election you were certain to win is never easy. Up against a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Obama won</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/17/how-obama-won/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/17/how-obama-won/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Election campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. presidential election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=312486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stakes were never so high, the battle never so bitter. With America’s future in the balance, Barack Obama overcame a surprising surge from Mitt Romney to re-capture the presidency. The inside story, by Luiza Ch. Savage]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/17/how-obama-won/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The stakes were never so high, the battle never so bitter. With America’s future in the balance, Barack Obama overcame a surprising surge from Mitt Romney to re-capture the presidency. The inside story, by Luiza Ch. Savage
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and the promise of four more years</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/obama-and-the-promise-of-four-more-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/obama-and-the-promise-of-four-more-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=314245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What can and will this second-term president accomplish?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/obama-and-the-promise-of-four-more-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What can and will this second-term president accomplish?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics for pretty people</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/20/politics-for-pretty-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/20/politics-for-pretty-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Weinman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Louis-Dreyfus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julianna Margulies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigourney Weaver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Wife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the newsroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veep]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=275349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A raft of new shows appeals to the broadest audience possible by getting rid of the parties]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/20/politics-for-pretty-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A raft of new shows appeals to the broadest audience possible by getting rid of the parties
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wish George Romney, not Mitt, was running for president</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/01/wish-george-not-mitt-romney-was-running-for-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/01/wish-george-not-mitt-romney-was-running-for-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Teitel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teitel page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=262934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no problem at all with the older fellow's inconsistencies]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/01/wish-george-not-mitt-romney-was-running-for-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	I have no problem at all with the older fellow's inconsistencies
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper 2012</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/22/harper-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/22/harper-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Barro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Yglesias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=241438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh Barro suggests a solution to the Republican Party&#8217;s current predicament.
On @mattyglesias&#8216;s point...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/22/harper-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Josh Barro suggests a solution to the Republican Party&#8217;s current predicament.
On @mattyglesias&#8216;s point...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Santorum surge</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/the-santorum-surge/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/the-santorum-surge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop primaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super PACs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working-class]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=239985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Support is soaring for the father of seven who offers the rhetorical red meat Romney can’t]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/the-santorum-surge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Support is soaring for the father of seven who offers the rhetorical red meat Romney can’t
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP: not even the end of the beginning</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/27/gop-not-even-the-end-of-the-beginning/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/27/gop-not-even-the-end-of-the-beginning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican primaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=236036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is easy to forget how much happened in the Democratic race of 2008]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/27/gop-not-even-the-end-of-the-beginning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It is easy to forget how much happened in the Democratic race of 2008
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The doge of Des Moines</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/21/the-doge-of-des-moines/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/21/the-doge-of-des-moines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andy cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethanol subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa caucuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa republican party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serenissima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=230702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What has me concerned is that on Main Street Iowa people are coming up...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/21/the-doge-of-des-moines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What has me concerned is that on Main Street Iowa people are coming up...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Republican race heats up</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/15/the-republican-race-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/15/the-republican-race-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa straw poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=209524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann wins the Iowa straw poll on Saturday, former Minnesota governor...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/15/the-republican-race-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann wins the Iowa straw poll on Saturday, former Minnesota governor...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A mad rush toward the GOP? Not quite.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/a-mad-rush-not-quite/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/a-mad-rush-not-quite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 13:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. presidential race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=191446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far, the race for the Republican presidential nomination has been anything but]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/a-mad-rush-not-quite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	So far, the race for the Republican presidential nomination has been anything but
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking north</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 15:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fourteen years after describing the American conservative movement as &#8220;a light and an inspiration...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
	Fourteen years after describing the American conservative movement as &#8220;a light and an inspiration...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How far to the right will U.S. conservatives go?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/20/between-wrong-and-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/20/between-wrong-and-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=172995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives are split over how to carry out their mission—and how to deal with a resurgent President]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/20/between-wrong-and-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	Conservatives are split over how to carry out their mission—and how to deal with a resurgent President
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin is unstoppable</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/16/unstoppable/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/16/unstoppable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 U.S. election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rogue: An American Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockwell Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tonight Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=115037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How she's changing the face of American politics]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/16/unstoppable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>196</slash:comments>
	How she's changing the face of American politics
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin&#039;s Gamble</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/06/sarah-palins-gamble/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/06/sarah-palins-gamble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resignation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=68867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chances are, it won't pay off with the presidency]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/06/sarah-palins-gamble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
	Chances are, it won't pay off with the presidency
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin For President</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/02/sarah-palin-for-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/02/sarah-palin-for-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican renewal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=68478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What the governor of Alaska needs to do to be ready for 2012]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/02/sarah-palin-for-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>122</slash:comments>
	What the governor of Alaska needs to do to be ready for 2012
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If I Were a Republican&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/01/if-i-were-a-republican/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/01/if-i-were-a-republican/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=54231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been active in politics for over 30 years. I&#8217;ve been on the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/01/if-i-were-a-republican/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	I have been active in politics for over 30 years. I&#8217;ve been on the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Disarray</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/17/republican-disarray/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/17/republican-disarray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=50963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preliminary reviews would lead us to believe that President Obama will get kudos when...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/17/republican-disarray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	Preliminary reviews would lead us to believe that President Obama will get kudos when...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and the confusion in the GOP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/27/obama-and-the-confusion-in-the-gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/27/obama-and-the-confusion-in-the-gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. budget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=46186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing is apparent these days in Washington: The Republicans are lost and confused,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/27/obama-and-the-confusion-in-the-gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	One thing is apparent these days in Washington: The Republicans are lost and confused,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Party of Lincoln and Eisenhower</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/03/the-party-of-lincoln-and-eisenhower/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/03/the-party-of-lincoln-and-eisenhower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eisenhower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=33207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most significant transformation the Republican party has undergone has been its shift from...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/03/the-party-of-lincoln-and-eisenhower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	The most significant transformation the Republican party has undergone has been its shift from...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megapundit: The 100-second column</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/12/megapundit-the-100-second-column/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/12/megapundit-the-100-second-column/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>selley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Megapundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100-mile diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian print media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vimy Memorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMDs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=17321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Miscellaneous Canadian news...</strong>
On a weird, slow day in the world of punditry, that&#8217;s]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/12/megapundit-the-100-second-column/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	<strong>Miscellaneous Canadian news...</strong>
On a weird, slow day in the world of punditry, that&#8217;s
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megapundit: He &quot;changed the subject&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/05/megapundit-he-changed-the-subject/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/05/megapundit-he-changed-the-subject/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>selley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Megapundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derek Burney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacqueline Henley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=15376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Must-reads: ...</strong>Robert Fulford, John Ibbitson, David Frum, Doug Saunders, Dan Gardner and John Ivison]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/05/megapundit-he-changed-the-subject/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	<strong>Must-reads: ...</strong>Robert Fulford, John Ibbitson, David Frum, Doug Saunders, Dan Gardner and John Ivison
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
