<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Royal succession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/royal-succession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:49:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;This bill is a sham&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/this-bill-is-a-sham/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/this-bill-is-a-sham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 01:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elaine McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh Segal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serge Joyal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit late, the royal succession bill might get a debate in the Senate]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/this-bill-is-a-sham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A bit late, the royal succession bill might get a debate in the Senate
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The de-patriation of the Canadian constitution&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/the-de-partiation-of-the-canadian-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/the-de-partiation-of-the-canadian-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Twomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House passes a problematic bill]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/the-de-partiation-of-the-canadian-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The House passes a problematic bill
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Queen of Canada is dead; long live the British Queen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/03/the-queen-of-canada-is-dead-long-live-the-british-queen/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/03/the-queen-of-canada-is-dead-long-live-the-british-queen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Conservatives must rethink their approach to succession]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/03/the-queen-of-canada-is-dead-long-live-the-british-queen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why the Conservatives must rethink their approach to succession
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Act to assent to alterations in the law touching the Succession to the Throne</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/an-act-to-assent-to-alterations-in-the-law-touching-the-succession-to-the-throne/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/an-act-to-assent-to-alterations-in-the-law-touching-the-succession-to-the-throne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Flynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=345231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives have now tabled the legislation that will, in the words of the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/an-act-to-assent-to-alterations-in-the-law-touching-the-succession-to-the-throne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservatives have now tabled the legislation that will, in the words of the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boys no longer reign supreme in royal succession</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/28/boys-no-longer-reign-supreme-in-royal-succession/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/28/boys-no-longer-reign-supreme-in-royal-succession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=222191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First-born child to be next in line to British throne regardless of gender ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/28/boys-no-longer-reign-supreme-in-royal-succession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	First-born child to be next in line to British throne regardless of gender 
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
