<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Senate reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/senate-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In this new crisis, the faint echo of a previous crisis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/18/in-this-new-crisis-the-faint-echo-of-a-previous-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/18/in-this-new-crisis-the-faint-echo-of-a-previous-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the coalition crisis of 2008 to the Senate crisis of 2013]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/18/in-this-new-crisis-the-faint-echo-of-a-previous-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From the coalition crisis of 2008 to the Senate crisis of 2013
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Senate: The only thing standing between us and tyranny</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/13/the-senate-the-only-thing-standing-between-us-and-tyranny/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/13/the-senate-the-only-thing-standing-between-us-and-tyranny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bert Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=359886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bert Brown fears what abolishment would bring]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/13/the-senate-the-only-thing-standing-between-us-and-tyranny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Bert Brown fears what abolishment would bring
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada&#8217;s Senate: Chamber of disrepute</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/contempt-for-the-whole-institution/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/contempt-for-the-whole-institution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate term limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After months of scandals, could it finally be time to scrap the Senate? John Geddes reports]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/contempt-for-the-whole-institution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	After months of scandals, could it finally be time to scrap the Senate? John Geddes reports
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Senate and the Clarity Act are safe&#8230; for now</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/the-senate-and-the-clarity-act-are-safe-for-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/the-senate-and-the-clarity-act-are-safe-for-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 23:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarity act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House votes to keep both]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/the-senate-and-the-clarity-act-are-safe-for-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The House votes to keep both
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: What if we all just refused to be appointed to the Senate?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/the-commons-what-if-we-all-just-refused-to-be-appointed-to-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/the-commons-what-if-we-all-just-refused-to-be-appointed-to-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somewhere a mariachi band plays a plaintive tune]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/the-commons-what-if-we-all-just-refused-to-be-appointed-to-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Somewhere a mariachi band plays a plaintive tune
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Kevin Page as Lord Voldemort</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/the-commons-kicking-the-senate-around-and-kevin-page-as-lord-voldemort/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/the-commons-kicking-the-senate-around-and-kevin-page-as-lord-voldemort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 22:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP attacks the Senate, the Senate questions the PBO]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/the-commons-kicking-the-senate-around-and-kevin-page-as-lord-voldemort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP attacks the Senate, the Senate questions the PBO
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s talk about abolishing the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/lets-talk-about-abolishing-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/lets-talk-about-abolishing-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP attempts to win House approval for the end of the red chamber]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/lets-talk-about-abolishing-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP attempts to win House approval for the end of the red chamber
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abolish the Senate and save future Michael Fortiers the disappointment</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/abolish-the-senate-and-save-future-michael-fortiers-the-disappointment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/abolish-the-senate-and-save-future-michael-fortiers-the-disappointment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Fortier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Conservative senator questions the Senate's "usefulness"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/abolish-the-senate-and-save-future-michael-fortiers-the-disappointment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A Conservative senator questions the Senate's "usefulness"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: John Baird, Pierre Poilievre and the hypocritical oath</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/the-commons-john-baird-pierre-poilievre-and-the-hypocritical-oath/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/the-commons-john-baird-pierre-poilievre-and-the-hypocritical-oath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre poilievre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=355478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The gleeful master of gotcha and the Minister of State for I-Know-You-Are-But-What-Am-I?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/the-commons-john-baird-pierre-poilievre-and-the-hypocritical-oath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The gleeful master of gotcha and the Minister of State for I-Know-You-Are-But-What-Am-I?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suddenly the Prime Minister believes he needs the opposition&#8217;s permission?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/suddenly-the-prime-minister-believes-he-needs-the-oppositions-permission/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/suddenly-the-prime-minister-believes-he-needs-the-oppositions-permission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time allocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has he forgotten about the option of time allocation?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/suddenly-the-prime-minister-believes-he-needs-the-oppositions-permission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Has he forgotten about the option of time allocation?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to spend a year not doing anything on Senate reform, while demanding change</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/how-to-spend-a-year-not-doing-anything-on-senate-reform-while-demanding-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/how-to-spend-a-year-not-doing-anything-on-senate-reform-while-demanding-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uppal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time allocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why don't the Conservatives just pass their bill?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/how-to-spend-a-year-not-doing-anything-on-senate-reform-while-demanding-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why don't the Conservatives just pass their bill?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bob Rae on abolishing the Senate, circa 1984</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/bob-rae-on-abolishing-the-senate-circa-1984/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/bob-rae-on-abolishing-the-senate-circa-1984/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long ago wisdom from a young New Democrat]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/bob-rae-on-abolishing-the-senate-circa-1984/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Long ago wisdom from a young New Democrat
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Senators need not fear unemployment</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/the-commons-senators-need-not-fear-unemployment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/the-commons-senators-need-not-fear-unemployment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diane Finley explains the difference between a quota and a target]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/the-commons-senators-need-not-fear-unemployment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Diane Finley explains the difference between a quota and a target
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: Marc Garneau disagrees with Justin Trudeau</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/breaking-marc-garneau-disagrees-with-justin-trudeau/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/breaking-marc-garneau-disagrees-with-justin-trudeau/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=353446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This time, it's about Senate reform]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/breaking-marc-garneau-disagrees-with-justin-trudeau/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	This time, it's about Senate reform
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tories to Supreme Court: review Senate reform &#8211; and make it snappy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/tories-to-supreme-court-review-senate-reform-and-make-it-snappy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/tories-to-supreme-court-review-senate-reform-and-make-it-snappy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=351503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; The federal government is asking the Supreme Court to study its Senate-reform...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/tories-to-supreme-court-review-senate-reform-and-make-it-snappy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; The federal government is asking the Supreme Court to study its Senate-reform...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Canadians want a Senate?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/do-canadians-want-a-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/do-canadians-want-a-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh Segal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=351341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative Senator Hugh Segal revives his proposal of a referendum on Senate abolition.
Segal...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/do-canadians-want-a-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Conservative Senator Hugh Segal revives his proposal of a referendum on Senate abolition.
Segal...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why nothing gets done on Senate reform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/14/why-nothing-ever-gets-done-on-senate-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/14/why-nothing-ever-gets-done-on-senate-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister stephen harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=350740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martin Patriquin explains why the status quo is here to stay ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/14/why-nothing-ever-gets-done-on-senate-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Martin Patriquin explains why the status quo is here to stay 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How would Trudeau appoint senators?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/14/how-would-trudeau-appoint-senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/14/how-would-trudeau-appoint-senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=350632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['A transparent, open process that leaves people confident']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/14/how-would-trudeau-appoint-senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'A transparent, open process that leaves people confident'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: And so Stephen Harper finds himself having to defend unelected Senators</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-commons-and-so-stephen-harper-finds-himself-having-to-defend-unelected-senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-commons-and-so-stephen-harper-finds-himself-having-to-defend-unelected-senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Julian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=350290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh for the bygone simplicity of Senate reform]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-commons-and-so-stephen-harper-finds-himself-having-to-defend-unelected-senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Oh for the bygone simplicity of Senate reform
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The solution is not better patronage</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-solution-is-not-better-patronage/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-solution-is-not-better-patronage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=349812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau's flawed solution to Senate reform]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-solution-is-not-better-patronage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Justin Trudeau's flawed solution to Senate reform
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How did Patrick Brazeau rate a seat in the Senate?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/patrick-brazeaus-sordid-story-and-senate-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/patrick-brazeaus-sordid-story-and-senate-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 23:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assembly of First Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idle No More]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister stephen harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate term limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Bert Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Patrick Brazeau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=348744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Removed from this week's news, it's a question worth asking]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/patrick-brazeaus-sordid-story-and-senate-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Removed from this week's news, it's a question worth asking
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amending the Constitution to keep the Senate from vetoing the House</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/amending-the-constitution-to-keep-the-senate-from-vetoing-the-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/amending-the-constitution-to-keep-the-senate-from-vetoing-the-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bert Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister apparently has a plan]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/amending-the-constitution-to-keep-the-senate-from-vetoing-the-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Prime Minister apparently has a plan
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Supreme Court, please tell us what we can do to the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/01/dear-supreme-court-please-tell-us-what-to-do-with-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/01/dear-supreme-court-please-tell-us-what-to-do-with-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uppal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=345825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives seek advice on Senate reform]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/01/dear-supreme-court-please-tell-us-what-to-do-with-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservatives seek advice on Senate reform
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capital diary: Lisa Raitt&#8217;s &#8216;Les Miserables&#8217; Christmas</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/capital-diary-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/capital-diary-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel Raphael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kellie Leitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Raitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Hall Findlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitchel Raphael on the minister's favourtie musical and wine issues at the Liberal party]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/capital-diary-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Mitchel Raphael on the minister's favourtie musical and wine issues at the Liberal party
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Senate&#8217;s last stand?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/16/the-senates-last-stand/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/16/the-senates-last-stand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-290]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windsor Star]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=315830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Windsor Star says if the Senate defeats C-290 it will be another reason...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/16/the-senates-last-stand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Windsor Star says if the Senate defeats C-290 it will be another reason...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Told you so</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/told-you-so-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/told-you-so-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=294513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephane Dion chides the Conservatives on news that the Harper government will be referring...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/told-you-so-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephane Dion chides the Conservatives on news that the Harper government will be referring...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paging the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/paging-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/paging-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=294408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than six years after forming government, the Conservatives want the Supreme Court to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/paging-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	More than six years after forming government, the Conservatives want the Supreme Court to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A strongly worded letter from Stephane Dion</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/03/a-strongly-worded-letter-from-stephane-dion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/03/a-strongly-worded-letter-from-stephane-dion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 20:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uppal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=280983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephane Dion, who has some experience with the written argument, sends a letter to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/03/a-strongly-worded-letter-from-stephane-dion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephane Dion, who has some experience with the written argument, sends a letter to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you solve a problem like the Senate?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/30/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/30/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winnipeg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=278434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian Press finds that the Senate is not quite an exemplar of openness...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/30/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Canadian Press finds that the Senate is not quite an exemplar of openness...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper&#8217;s Senate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/17/stephen-harpers-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/17/stephen-harpers-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bert Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=274881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Postmedia tries to figure out how long the Senate could be Conservative.
A Postmedia...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/17/stephen-harpers-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Postmedia tries to figure out how long the Senate could be Conservative.
A Postmedia...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Gibbins against Senate reform? The hell you say!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/14/roger-gibbins-against-senate-reform-the-hell-you-say/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/14/roger-gibbins-against-senate-reform-the-hell-you-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 10:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada West Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Gibbins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple-E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=258412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even the departing head of a Western Canadian think tank that preached the Senate...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/14/roger-gibbins-against-senate-reform-the-hell-you-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Even the departing head of a Western Canadian think tank that preached the Senate...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 more things you need to know about the Alberta election</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/10-more-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-alberta-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/10-more-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-alberta-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 alberta election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta ndp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta new democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alison redford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Mason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridget pastoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bruce mcallister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danielle Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david hancock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doug black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floor crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guy boutilier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heather Forsyth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ian urquhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new democratic party of alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc party of alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progressive conservative party of alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rachel notley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raj Sherman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott tannas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators-in-waiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Morton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turncoats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildrose party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildrose party of alberta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=254446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NDP leader Brian Mason's first words on reaching the podium? "The phone booth just doubled!"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/10-more-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-alberta-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	NDP leader Brian Mason's first words on reaching the podium? "The phone booth just doubled!"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our looming constitutional crisis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/25/our-looming-constitutional-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/25/our-looming-constitutional-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Funke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Topp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Accountability Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Kenny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nortel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=235517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the midst of defending the Senate, Colin Kenny offers the following.
No question,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/25/our-looming-constitutional-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In the midst of defending the Senate, Colin Kenny offers the following.
No question,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Double-E G-G?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/07/a-double-e-g-g/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/07/a-double-e-g-g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 19:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Head of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen maher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple-E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viceroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viceroyalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=232468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the journalism game, we call it “burying the lede”. Friday&#8217;s Postmedia papers have...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/07/a-double-e-g-g/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In the journalism game, we call it “burying the lede”. Friday&#8217;s Postmedia papers have...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A muddled Senate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/a-muddled-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/a-muddled-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Jedras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=219372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff Jedras notes Stephane Dion&#8217;s continued dissection of the Harper government&#8217;s Senate reforms, including...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/a-muddled-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	Jeff Jedras notes Stephane Dion&#8217;s continued dissection of the Harper government&#8217;s Senate reforms, including...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate reform: it&#8217;s Harper vs. the experts—again</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/senate-reform-its-harper-vs-the-experts%e2%80%94again/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/senate-reform-its-harper-vs-the-experts%e2%80%94again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter O'Neil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=219365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter O&#8217;Neil of the Vancouver Sun takes an enterprising approach in this story that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/senate-reform-its-harper-vs-the-experts%e2%80%94again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	Peter O&#8217;Neil of the Vancouver Sun takes an enterprising approach in this story that...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experts in B.C., Alberta don’t like Harper’s Senate reforms</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/experts-in-b-c-alberta-don%e2%80%99t-like-harper%e2%80%99s-senate-reforms/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/experts-in-b-c-alberta-don%e2%80%99t-like-harper%e2%80%99s-senate-reforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=219379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Survey of profs finds few like the Conservative approach]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/experts-in-b-c-alberta-don%e2%80%99t-like-harper%e2%80%99s-senate-reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	Survey of profs finds few like the Conservative approach
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The MP who has to talk about the Senate all summer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/23/mitchel-raphael-on-the-mp-who-has-to-talk-about-the-senate-all-summer/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/23/mitchel-raphael-on-the-mp-who-has-to-talk-about-the-senate-all-summer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel Raphael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bal Gosal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Storseth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darcy Tucker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gord Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kellie Leitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Pither]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Rempel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter McKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uppal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=210171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Handy having an orthopaedic surgeon</strong>
Ontario Conservative MP <strong>Patrick Brown...</strong>’s annual Hockey Night]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/23/mitchel-raphael-on-the-mp-who-has-to-talk-about-the-senate-all-summer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	<strong>Handy having an orthopaedic surgeon</strong>
Ontario Conservative MP <strong>Patrick Brown...</strong>’s annual Hockey Night
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.S. debt-ceiling dance and Canadian Senate reform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/20/the-u-s-debt-ceiling-dance-and-canadian-senate-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/20/the-u-s-debt-ceiling-dance-and-canadian-senate-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Claude Nolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uppal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Watson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=205613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadians and Brits have no reason to feel superior to the U.S.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/20/the-u-s-debt-ceiling-dance-and-canadian-senate-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
	Canadians and Brits have no reason to feel superior to the U.S.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Conservative in charge of fixing the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/18/mr-fix-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/18/mr-fix-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Claude Nolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Reform Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uppal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=201975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Uppal's first big obstacle is opposition from within his own party. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/18/mr-fix-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
	Tim Uppal's first big obstacle is opposition from within his own party. 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadians want Senate referendum</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/13/canadians-want-senate-referendum/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/13/canadians-want-senate-referendum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=202018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New poll shows large majority in favour of vote on future of Red Chamber]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/13/canadians-want-senate-referendum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	New poll shows large majority in favour of vote on future of Red Chamber
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Senate if we must, but must we have a Senate?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/12/a-senate-if-we-must-but-must-we-have-a-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/12/a-senate-if-we-must-but-must-we-have-a-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angus Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=201740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is obviously noteworthy that the Canadian public largely supports Stephen Harper&#8217;s proposed reforms...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/12/a-senate-if-we-must-but-must-we-have-a-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	It is obviously noteworthy that the Canadian public largely supports Stephen Harper&#8217;s proposed reforms...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dion positions Liberals with West on Senate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/dion-positions-liberals-with-west-on-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/dion-positions-liberals-with-west-on-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Liberal leader tries to undermine Harper in his Tory heartland with position on reform]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/dion-positions-liberals-with-west-on-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	Former Liberal leader tries to undermine Harper in his Tory heartland with position on reform
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our upper house of ill repute</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/04/our-upper-house-of-ill-repute/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/04/our-upper-house-of-ill-repute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=199590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne on why the Senate is intolerable]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/04/our-upper-house-of-ill-repute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne on why the Senate is intolerable
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Original sin</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/29/original-sin/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/29/original-sin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confederation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JJ McCullough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=199374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JJ McCullough blames the founding fathers for the Senate.
Canada is a living example...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/29/original-sin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
	JJ McCullough blames the founding fathers for the Senate.
Canada is a living example...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
