<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; senators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/senators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Audit into senators&#8217; housing allowances to be made public</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/09/audit-into-senators-housing-allowances-to-be-made-public/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/09/audit-into-senators-housing-allowances-to-be-made-public/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=382001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Potentially explosive audits into dodgy housing expenses claimed by three senators are...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/09/audit-into-senators-housing-allowances-to-be-made-public/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Potentially explosive audits into dodgy housing expenses claimed by three senators are...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Travel expenses: 70 per cent of senators take a hint</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/03/travel-expenses-70-per-cent-of-senators-take-a-hint/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/03/travel-expenses-70-per-cent-of-senators-take-a-hint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Shendruk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Show and Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=366795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interactive breakdown of the Senate's travel spending ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/03/travel-expenses-70-per-cent-of-senators-take-a-hint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	An interactive breakdown of the Senate's travel spending 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated: Harper&#8217;s new Senate appointments feature personal, political connections</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/25/harper-appoints-five-new-senators-from-ontario-alberta-saskatchewan-and-n-l/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/25/harper-appoints-five-new-senators-from-ontario-alberta-saskatchewan-and-n-l/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=342236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Personal connections and political obligations played a role Friday as Stephen Harper...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/25/harper-appoints-five-new-senators-from-ontario-alberta-saskatchewan-and-n-l/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Personal connections and political obligations played a role Friday as Stephen Harper...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Just laugh it off</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/17/the-commons-just-laugh-it-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/17/the-commons-just-laugh-it-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-311]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheryl Gallant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Accountability Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawrence cannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Dewar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sooner we begin quietly accepting the government's decisions, the easier it will be for everyone]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/17/the-commons-just-laugh-it-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
	The sooner we begin quietly accepting the government's decisions, the easier it will be for everyone
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#039;s constitutional crisis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/17/todays-constitutional-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/17/todays-constitutional-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-311]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Accountability Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives senators called a snap vote last night and defeated Bill C-311, the Climate...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/17/todays-constitutional-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>294</slash:comments>
	Conservatives senators called a snap vote last night and defeated Bill C-311, the Climate...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#039;ve got mail</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/12/youve-got-mail-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/12/youve-got-mail-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Runciman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don plett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ten percenters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote subsidy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=157702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government that wants—on &#8220;principle&#8221;—to end the vote subsidy for political parties, finds a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/12/youve-got-mail-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
	The government that wants—on &#8220;principle&#8221;—to end the vote subsidy for political parties, finds a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The red shift</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/18/the-red-shift/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/18/the-red-shift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=143154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberal senator Grant Mitchell contemplates the potential possibilities and pitfalls of senate reform.
Electing...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/18/the-red-shift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Liberal senator Grant Mitchell contemplates the potential possibilities and pitfalls of senate reform.
Electing...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How they do it</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/18/how-they-do-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/18/how-they-do-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Packer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Kaiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=143110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If senate reform is, as has been hinted, to be prominent in the government&#8217;s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/18/how-they-do-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	If senate reform is, as has been hinted, to be prominent in the government&#8217;s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happened to you guys? You used to be cool</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/09/what-happened-to-you-guys-you-used-to-be-cool/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/09/what-happened-to-you-guys-you-used-to-be-cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Runciman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Patterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irving Gerstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Neufeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=137863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two of Stephen Harper&#8217;s senators are now openly quibbling with the idea of a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/09/what-happened-to-you-guys-you-used-to-be-cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Two of Stephen Harper&#8217;s senators are now openly quibbling with the idea of a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;I am pleased to have this opportunity to respond&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/05/i-am-pleased-to-have-this-opportunity-to-respond/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/05/i-am-pleased-to-have-this-opportunity-to-respond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cowan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=114251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, Liberal Senator James Cowan wrote the Justice Minister requesting a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/05/i-am-pleased-to-have-this-opportunity-to-respond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	A few weeks ago, Liberal Senator James Cowan wrote the Justice Minister requesting a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unelected senators, to save democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/23/unelected-senators-to-save-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/23/unelected-senators-to-save-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elaine McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=110654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Elaine McCoy makes the case for a reformed, but still appointed, Senate.
Consider...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/23/unelected-senators-to-save-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
	Senator Elaine McCoy makes the case for a reformed, but still appointed, Senate.
Consider...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;I look forward to your clarification of these issues for Canadians&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/i-look-forward-to-your-clarification-of-these-issues-for-canadians/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/i-look-forward-to-your-clarification-of-these-issues-for-canadians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cowan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prorogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proroguing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator James Cowan cordially partakes of the ancient art of open-letter writing.
As Minister...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/i-look-forward-to-your-clarification-of-these-issues-for-canadians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	Senator James Cowan cordially partakes of the ancient art of open-letter writing.
As Minister...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the magazine</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/from-the-magazine-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/from-the-magazine-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elaine McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowell murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Conservative party of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/from-the-magazine-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something like 750 words on the last of the Progressive Conservatives on Parliament Hill....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/from-the-magazine-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	Something like 750 words on the last of the Progressive Conservatives on Parliament Hill....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/01/idea-alert-16/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/01/idea-alert-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=104919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff proposes senate reform.
Ignatieff proposed a 12-year term limit on Senate positions...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/01/idea-alert-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
	Michael Ignatieff proposes senate reform.
Ignatieff proposed a 12-year term limit on Senate positions...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five for fighting</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/29/five-for-fighting/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/29/five-for-fighting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Runciman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre-Highes Boisvenu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prorogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proroguing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rose-May Poirier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vim Kochar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=104626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You new senators are Bob Runciman, Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu, Vim Kochhar, Elizabeth Marshall, and Rose-May...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/29/five-for-fighting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	You new senators are Bob Runciman, Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu, Vim Kochhar, Elizabeth Marshall, and Rose-May...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;If that&#039;s their excuse&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/11/if-thats-their-excuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/11/if-thats-their-excuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prorogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proroguing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Hall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=100783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Picking one of the excuses offered so far, a former House of Commons procedural...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/11/if-thats-their-excuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	Picking one of the excuses offered so far, a former House of Commons procedural...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stoffer undaunted</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/11/stoffer-undaunted/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/11/stoffer-undaunted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Stoffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sackville-Eastern Shore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=91815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Stoffer was apparently unpersuaded by Mike Duffy&#8217;s taunts last week.
&#8220;I&#8217;m responsible to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/11/stoffer-undaunted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
	Peter Stoffer was apparently unpersuaded by Mike Duffy&#8217;s taunts last week.
&#8220;I&#8217;m responsible to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everybody&#039;s got a price (Updated)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/everybodys-got-a-price/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/everybodys-got-a-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car dealership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Demers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loto-Québec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I was watching my beloved Habs drop yet another game last Thursday—seriously guys,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/everybodys-got-a-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	As I was watching my beloved Habs drop yet another game last Thursday—seriously guys,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;It can be boring. It can be riveting. It can be silly. It can be vital to democracy&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/it-can-be-boring-it-can-be-riveting-it-can-be-silly-it-can-be-vital-to-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/it-can-be-boring-it-can-be-riveting-it-can-be-silly-it-can-be-vital-to-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Star&#8217;s Joanna Smith gazes upon the Senate, survives to report back.
In the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/it-can-be-boring-it-can-be-riveting-it-can-be-silly-it-can-be-vital-to-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	The Star&#8217;s Joanna Smith gazes upon the Senate, survives to report back.
In the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: And that&#039;s when the nuns started yelling</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/16/the-commons-and-thats-when-the-nuns-started-yelling/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/16/the-commons-and-thats-when-the-nuns-started-yelling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body bags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic LeBlanc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Byrne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Rafferty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seal hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seal hunt protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Blaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wayne easter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All eyes were on Jack Layton, after those unruly "sisters" were escorted outside]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/16/the-commons-and-thats-when-the-nuns-started-yelling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
	All eyes were on Jack Layton, after those unruly "sisters" were escorted outside
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Horse and buggy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/15/horse-and-buggy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/15/horse-and-buggy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Kinsella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wayne easter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=81854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberals employ an antiquated form of transportation to make a point about something.
The...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/15/horse-and-buggy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
	Liberals employ an antiquated form of transportation to make a point about something.
The...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case for Doug Finley</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/08/the-case-for-doug-finley/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/08/the-case-for-doug-finley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carolyn stewart olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don plett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=80196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Albert bravely makes the case for senators Finley, Stewart-Olsen and Plett.
That the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/08/the-case-for-doug-finley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	Richard Albert bravely makes the case for senators Finley, Stewart-Olsen and Plett.
That the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unelected representative democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/31/unelected-representative-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/31/unelected-representative-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michaëlle Jean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=73692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dale Smith sings the praises of the Governor General, then goes ahead and makes...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/31/unelected-representative-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
	Dale Smith sings the praises of the Governor General, then goes ahead and makes...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
