Posts Tagged ‘South Park’

Friendly Writers Out of Touch, Humble Folks With Information

By Jaime Weinman - Thursday, October 29, 2009 - 3 Comments

I haven’t had much to say about the new run of South Park, and I don’t see much excitement about it online or in the news, either. The show goes through periods of relevance and irrelevance: it was huge in the first season, the bubble burst in the second season, and it became a phenomenon again with the movie. Right now it seems to be only marginally relevant, though it’s still entertaining thanks to the basic strength of the characters. It does seem, though, like Trey Parker and Matt Stone have become the stereotypical Hollywood writers who don’t get out much and no longer have a lot of life experience to draw on for their comedy (since they spend all their time either making the show, or just being rich and happy). Thus, in the four episodes they’ve done in this run so far, we’ve had an episode making fun of pro wrestling, not exactly a timely target. And when Parker is really stumped for an idea, he just makes fun of a reality show he watches: one of the four recent episodes was a parody of Ghost Hunters, and the most recent one was a parody of Whale Wars. Plus Parker’s usual obsession with video games:

I think South Park is at its best when it just has the kids acting like kids, anyway, so the lack of hard-hitting topical humour doesn’t bother me, and the characters (especially Butters) are funny enough that even a phoned-in episode can make me laugh. But a lot of the show’s appeal is its timeliness and its ability to create buzz. And for the moment, it’s going through one of those phases where it doesn’t seem to be creating a whole lot of buzz, because the episodes are a bit insular, based on stuff that Trey Parker is obsessed with but maybe the rest of the world isn’t. The most notorious example was last year when he devoted two episodes to what he thought was the phenomenon of Peruvian Flute Bands in malls, only to realize that many malls do not, in fact, have those bands.

It’s an occupational hazard for comedy writers, who frequently wind up writing stuff in that they’re interested in, or that makes sense to the locals, without making this stuff make sense to an international audience. Shows made in New York have all kinds of New York references; L.A. shows have a tendency to get obsessed with diamond lanes, Vin Scully, and other things that non-Angelenos couldn’t care less about. (Okay, I cared about Vin Scully when he was doing NBC’s game of the week. He’s not any more, yet The Simpsons still has Harry Shearer do his Scully impression.) It’s a little more pronounced with South Park because it’s so clearly a product of Parker’s personal obsessions, so when he gets into something that isn’t really a topic of world interest (did you know that wrestling is fake?) it takes over the whole half-hour.

  • How Kanye West Became Defined By Trey Parker

    By Jaime Weinman - Monday, September 14, 2009 at 10:46 AM - 0 Comments

    I didn’t even think the South Park “Fishsticks” episode was one of their best, but it was an example of Trey Parker’s continuing ability to write jokes that somehow stick with you, and that you just can’t help quoting. (Some shows lose this ability; The Simpsons, even in the Mike Scully years, produced tons of lines that entered the culture, like “Save me, Jeebus!”, but it hasn’t done a lot of that lately. Or if there have been a bunch of compulsively-quotable Simpsons bits from the last few years, I’ve missed most of them.) Last night, even before Kanye West’s “Beyonce should have won and everybody should care what I think” incident, the Kanye West episode of South Park – and the term “gay fish” — was being quoted literally every half-minute on Twitter, and frequently on blogs.

    It’s not like the satirical point of the episode, or any South Park episode, was particularly deep or elightening. The point was that Kanye has no sense of humour and is really conceited; we knew that going in. But South Park hasn’t lasted this long because it’s some kind of brilliant intellectual take on the modern world (every so often, like after the movie, people will argue that, but it never lasts long, because Parker always winds up demonstrating that his understanding of issues never goes beyond what he reads on somebody’s website). It’s lasted because it has the ability to take a joke, or combine two or more jokes — Kanye’s humourlessness and the “fishsticks” joke — and come up with comedy bits that never get out of your head.

  • “Your Music Sucks And You Know It!”

    By Jaime Weinman - Thursday, March 12, 2009 at 1:17 PM - 0 Comments

    I enjoyed the season premiere of South Park more than last year’s; I won’t talk a lot about it because it hasn’t aired in Canada yet (the Comedy Network will have it this Friday at 9:30), but as often happens, Trey Parker started with really easy satirical targets, the Jonas Brothers, moved on to even easier targets, “purity rings,” and finally moved on to the easiest target of all. Which is fine. South Park always takes on easy targets.

    But the tip of the hat to A Face in the Crowd was fun, and it was good to see Kenny get an episode again; he had one last year, “Major Boobage,” but I didn’t care for that one much — the extra money they spent to do the hand-drawn Heavy Metal style animation just seemed to make the episode feel a little heavy and slow. This was an episode that actually drew on the things that made Kenny a fun character in the early years: he’s the only one of the four boys who is genuinely interested in sex. (Stan has a very chaste relationship with Wendy; Kyle has no apparent interest in girls; and Cartman talks about sex but doesn’t actually understand it. Kenny is the only one of these kids who isn’t an innocent on some level.) More Kenny stories, please.

    This episode also demonstrated again that Parker and Stone are no longer as out in front of pop-culture trends as they used to be. Last year, several of their episode dealt with trends or issues that were basically over by the time they did the show. Toward the end of the season they managed to satirize the current trends among kids (like Twilight), and this one was obviously supposed to be a follow-up to those episodes, by parodying the Jonas Brothers as the current big thing. Except that their 3-D movie bombed, so between the time this episode was conceived and the time it aired, the subject seemed a little out of date. Not that it really matters; it’s just that South Park’s ability to do episodes about things that are happening right now, once a much-hyped part of its appeal, now doesn’t seem to be as strong as it was.

  • Sud Parc

    By Jaime Weinman - Thursday, November 6, 2008 at 1:21 PM - 0 Comments

    The last few South Park episodes didn’t change my opinion that this season has been disappointing, and I agree that the election episode was a one-joke thing, but I did enjoy it more than their 2004 election episode, “Douche and Turd.” That one was based on the premise that there is no difference between the candidates, a faux-hip premise that felt like a stale leftover from 1996. But watching Randy Marsh (one of the best characters on the show) decide that everything in the world is awesome and perfect because his favourite candidate won, that’s a satirical point that actually makes sense, and it makes particular sense with Randy, because he’s an idiot who over-reacts to everything. SP is almost always better when it goes for character, which is why the Randy sections of this episode were better than the Ocean’s 11 parody, and why the best parts of the recent two-parter were Craig’s deadpan meta-comments on what a bunch of assholes the main characters are. The biggest problem this season is that they’ve mostly let character play second fiddle to movie parodies — a problem that a lot of shows have when they’ve run a long time, but a bigger problem for South Park because their movie parodies are almost always exactly the same (basically, they just repeat the plot of the movie and rely on the different situation/setting to provide the comedy).

    (And yes, it’s pretty clear that this episode would have been much the same if McCain had won. You’ll notice that the hard-core conservatives in South Park, like Kenny’s family and Uncle Jimbo, were not hanging out with the McCain supporters, so that this group could have been turned into Obama supporters if it went the other way. I mean, sure, Randy’s been a liberal in other episodes, but Randy’s insane, so he could have changed his mind.)

  • My Take On South Park…

    By Jaime Weinman - Friday, October 10, 2008 at 2:05 PM - 0 Comments

    …It’s a dangerous sign when a show does an episode that feels like a rehash of an earlier episode. Especially when the new episode isn’t as good. What I’m saying is that while I’m totally on Trey Parker’s side in hating what Spielberg and Lucas have done to their franchises, this was not as funny as virtually the same story in “Free Hat.”

  • South Park Is Back, But Is It BACK?

    By Jaime Weinman - Wednesday, October 8, 2008 at 5:07 PM - 1 Comment

    Tonight is the premiere of the second half of South Park’s 12th year. (Every “season” is really two seasons, one batch of episodes in the first part of the year, and another batch in the fall.) It’s not on in Canada simultaneously, but there will be lots of places to view it.

    The first half was kind of disappointing, despite some good individual moments and despite my article declaring that the show was better than ever. Based on seasons 9 through 11, I still stand by that, and the episodes this season certainly had some of the qualities that had made me enjoy the show more than I used to — meaning, less right-wing haranguing (I’m sorry… “libertarian” haranguing) and more character-based stories. (“Canada On Strike” was the only episode so far this season that really fell into the old South Park Continue…

From Macleans

>