<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Employee engagement surveys: useless or very useless?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/useless-or-very-useless/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/useless-or-very-useless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emily Senger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popular in the late 1990s, a new study says they're a waste of money]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/useless-or-very-useless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Popular in the late 1990s, a new study says they're a waste of money
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadians and debt: The struggle is getting worse</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/17/survey-nearly-half-of-canadians-couldnt-manage-their-mortgage-if-rates-rose/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/17/survey-nearly-half-of-canadians-couldnt-manage-their-mortgage-if-rates-rose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamsin McMahon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Institute for Chartered Accountants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=274901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One in five is borrowing to pay for daily expenses]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/17/survey-nearly-half-of-canadians-couldnt-manage-their-mortgage-if-rates-rose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	One in five is borrowing to pay for daily expenses
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A, B, C or D?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/a-b-c-or-d/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/a-b-c-or-d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cana­dian University Survey Consortium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Survey of Student Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student satisfaction survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university rankings issue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=157646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who better to ask than students whether universities are following best practices and making them happy?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/a-b-c-or-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Who better to ask than students whether universities are following best practices and making them happy?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our best (and worst) run cities</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/22/our-best-and-worst-run-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/22/our-best-and-worst-run-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic Institute for Market Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Conference Board of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federation of Canadian Municipalities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=70764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EXCLUSIVE REPORT: Which cities provide the best services per taxpayer’s buck? Canada’s first ever study of municipal effectiveness finds some surprises.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/22/our-best-and-worst-run-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	EXCLUSIVE REPORT: Which cities provide the best services per taxpayer’s buck? Canada’s first ever study of municipal effectiveness finds some surprises.
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
