<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; tax policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/tax-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Note to the NDP (and everyone else): the popular tax hikes don&#8217;t increase tax revenues</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/note-to-the-ndp-and-everyone-else-the-popular-tax-hikes-dont-increase-tax-revenues/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/note-to-the-ndp-and-everyone-else-the-popular-tax-hikes-dont-increase-tax-revenues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high income taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starve the beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=374916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on good politics and not very good economics]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/note-to-the-ndp-and-everyone-else-the-popular-tax-hikes-dont-increase-tax-revenues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on good politics and not very good economics
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dealing with inequality, part I: The bottom 99 per cent</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=331333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on why you should love the GST/HST]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on why you should love the GST/HST
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans divided over Taxpayer Protection Pledge as fiscal cliff looms</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/grover-not-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/grover-not-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans for Tax Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=323941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Zealot' Grover Norquist continues rally against taxes]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/grover-not-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'Zealot' Grover Norquist continues rally against taxes
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did 2010&#039;s man of the year die in 1897?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/did-2010s-man-of-the-year-die-in-1897/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/did-2010s-man-of-the-year-die-in-1897/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry George]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Marx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Value Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lib Dems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LVT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Cable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=153831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marxism is dead; long live Georgism! With Britain in austerity mode, its government pre-emptively...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/did-2010s-man-of-the-year-die-in-1897/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Marxism is dead; long live Georgism! With Britain in austerity mode, its government pre-emptively...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case for raising taxes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/29/the-case-for-raising-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/29/the-case-for-raising-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comptetitiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=104713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why sensible tax policy could help Canada build on its competitive advantages]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/29/the-case-for-raising-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
	Why sensible tax policy could help Canada build on its competitive advantages
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ‘Fiscal Four’ fight the deficit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/26/the-%e2%80%98fiscal-four%e2%80%99-fight-the-deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/26/the-%e2%80%98fiscal-four%e2%80%99-fight-the-deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Köhler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Griffiths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Four]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Denis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Fawcette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=93364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are the four working with Ed Stelmach, or against him?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/26/the-%e2%80%98fiscal-four%e2%80%99-fight-the-deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	Are the four working with Ed Stelmach, or against him?
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
