<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; tea party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/tea-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:49:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama’s own tea party is backed by big money</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/07/obamas-own-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/07/obamas-own-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=379252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new strategy for high-dollar donations troubles finance watchdogs]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/07/obamas-own-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A new strategy for high-dollar donations troubles finance watchdogs
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talking points on Obama&#8217;s speech</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/21/obama-gets-combative-the-notable-moments-of-the-inaugural-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/21/obama-gets-combative-the-notable-moments-of-the-inaugural-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Savage Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=340077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven key moments in the president's inaugural address]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/21/obama-gets-combative-the-notable-moments-of-the-inaugural-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Seven key moments in the president's inaugural address
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trouble at the Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/trouble-at-the-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/trouble-at-the-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Weinman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After losing two key players in as many weeks, does the grassroots movement carry the same weight?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/trouble-at-the-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	After losing two key players in as many weeks, does the grassroots movement carry the same weight?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court backs &#8216;Obamacare&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/22/obamacare-on-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/22/obamacare-on-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=269361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking news: Mixed ruling from U.S. Supreme Court supports Obama's health care reform law ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/22/obamacare-on-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Breaking news: Mixed ruling from U.S. Supreme Court supports Obama's health care reform law 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama: No more Mr. Nice guy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/08/no-more-mr-nice-guy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/08/no-more-mr-nice-guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bain capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremiah Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Ricketts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super PACs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=264479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just how ugly is the 2012 campaign going to get?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/08/no-more-mr-nice-guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Just how ugly is the 2012 campaign going to get?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Santorum surge</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/the-santorum-surge/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/the-santorum-surge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop primaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super PACs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working-class]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=239985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Support is soaring for the father of seven who offers the rhetorical red meat Romney can’t]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/the-santorum-surge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Support is soaring for the father of seven who offers the rhetorical red meat Romney can’t
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christian fundamentalism&#8217;s cool factor</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/23/christian-fundamentalisms-cool-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/23/christian-fundamentalisms-cool-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 20:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Teitel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teitel page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All American Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver broncos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kayak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Florida Family Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim tebow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=231090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why American businesses simply can't afford to not love Jesus]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/23/christian-fundamentalisms-cool-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why American businesses simply can't afford to not love Jesus
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lululemon goes Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/29/lululemon-goes-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/29/lululemon-goes-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Warnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ayn rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lululemon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=227224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The yoga pants maker is now selling bags with the phrase “Who is John Galt?” emblazoned on the side]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/29/lululemon-goes-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The yoga pants maker is now selling bags with the phrase “Who is John Galt?” emblazoned on the side
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Column-Inches!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/25/occupy-column-inches/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/25/occupy-column-inches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankers hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Calgary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=221490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By chance, I was on scene for the initial stage of the Occupy Calgary...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/25/occupy-column-inches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
	By chance, I was on scene for the initial stage of the Occupy Calgary...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A seven-point plan? Please. Mine has nine!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/20/a-seven-point-plan-please-mine-has-nine/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/20/a-seven-point-plan-please-mine-has-nine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michele bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/22/a-seven-point-plan-please-mine-has-nine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk on the ‘firebrand’ and the pizza man taking on America’s killer debt zombie in the GOP debate]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/20/a-seven-point-plan-please-mine-has-nine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	Scott Feschuk on the ‘firebrand’ and the pizza man taking on America’s killer debt zombie in the GOP debate
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A ‘sugar-coated Satan sandwich’</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/08/a-%e2%80%98sugar-coated-satan-sandwich%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/08/a-%e2%80%98sugar-coated-satan-sandwich%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar-coated Satan sandwich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=207527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[70 million payments to veterans and Social Security recipients would be at stake if the U.S. defaulted]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/08/a-%e2%80%98sugar-coated-satan-sandwich%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	70 million payments to veterans and Social Security recipients would be at stake if the U.S. defaulted
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who really won the U.S. debt debate?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/02/who-really-won-the-u-s-debt-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/02/who-really-won-the-u-s-debt-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government deficits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=207210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republicans don't have as much to celebrate as everyone thinks]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/02/who-really-won-the-u-s-debt-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	The Republicans don't have as much to celebrate as everyone thinks
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summer camp, Tea Party style</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/28/summer-camp-tea-party-style/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/28/summer-camp-tea-party-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlas Shrugged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Paradis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer camp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=205615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What better way to build lasting memories than with a group reading of Atlas Shrugged?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/28/summer-camp-tea-party-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	What better way to build lasting memories than with a group reading of Atlas Shrugged?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Light-bulb ban has voters incandescent with rage</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/19/light-bulb-ban-has-voters-incandescent-with-rage/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/19/light-bulb-ban-has-voters-incandescent-with-rage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact fluorescent lights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incandescent light bulbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light bulbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=201887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadians will obey a host of environmental regulations, but an apparently innocuous light-bulb policy may be going too far]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/19/light-bulb-ban-has-voters-incandescent-with-rage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	Canadians will obey a host of environmental regulations, but an apparently innocuous light-bulb policy may be going too far
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann goes into overdrive</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/07/bachmann-goes-into-overdrive/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/07/bachmann-goes-into-overdrive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=199709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hardline Minnesota congresswoman is smarter than Sarah Palin, and more dangerous]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/07/bachmann-goes-into-overdrive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	The hardline Minnesota congresswoman is smarter than Sarah Palin, and more dangerous
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann goes into overdrive</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/bachmann-goes-into-overdrive-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/bachmann-goes-into-overdrive-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=199709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hardline Minnesota congresswoman is smarter than Sarah Palin, and more dangerous]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/bachmann-goes-into-overdrive-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The hardline Minnesota congresswoman is smarter than Sarah Palin, and more dangerous
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP’s grand navigator</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/the-gop%e2%80%99s-grand-navigator/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/the-gop%e2%80%99s-grand-navigator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Speaker John Boehner has to satisfy his right flank—while still making deals with the White House]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/the-gop%e2%80%99s-grand-navigator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	House Speaker John Boehner has to satisfy his right flank—while still making deals with the White House
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How politics play into the U.S. government shutdown</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/how-politics-play-into-the-government-shutdown-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/how-politics-play-into-the-government-shutdown-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 20:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shutdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=181497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Friday, the U.S. government could shut down for the second time since 1995....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/how-politics-play-into-the-government-shutdown-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	This Friday, the U.S. government could shut down for the second time since 1995....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wanted: a Republican leader for 2012</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/14/wanted-a-republican-leader-for-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/14/wanted-a-republican-leader-for-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haley barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeb bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jon huntsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitch daniels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=177416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shouldn't GOP hopefuls be rushing into the race by now?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/14/wanted-a-republican-leader-for-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
	Shouldn't GOP hopefuls be rushing into the race by now?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How far to the right will U.S. conservatives go?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/20/between-wrong-and-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/20/between-wrong-and-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=172995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives are split over how to carry out their mission—and how to deal with a resurgent President]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/20/between-wrong-and-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	Conservatives are split over how to carry out their mission—and how to deal with a resurgent President
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s the matter with Arizona?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/what%e2%80%99s-the-matter-with-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/what%e2%80%99s-the-matter-with-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Derry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Goldwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Lee Loughner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharron Angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Giffords shooting isn't out of character for the desert state]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/what%e2%80%99s-the-matter-with-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	Why the Giffords shooting isn't out of character for the desert state
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to look for in U.S. politics in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/30/what-to-look-for-in-u-s-politics-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/30/what-to-look-for-in-u-s-politics-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=165262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the Democrats lick their wounds, the GOP looks to rein in the Tea Party]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/30/what-to-look-for-in-u-s-politics-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	While the Democrats lick their wounds, the GOP looks to rein in the Tea Party
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/09/introducing/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/09/introducing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Lunau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey hall of fame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaden Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naheed Nenshi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willow Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=161347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newsmaker entrances]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/09/introducing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Newsmaker entrances
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Chilean miners vs. the Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/01/the-chilean-miners-vs-the-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/01/the-chilean-miners-vs-the-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chilean miners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=161195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The working-class survivors face off against the political upstarts]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/01/the-chilean-miners-vs-the-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	The working-class survivors face off against the political upstarts
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsmakers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/12/newsmakers-46/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/12/newsmakers-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cesar Millan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing With the Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dog Whisperer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma Watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europeon Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judith Griggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liu Xiaobo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mission: Impossible IV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikki Haley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pamela anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silvio Berlusconi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Maple Leafs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. mid-term elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underwater caves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yugoslavia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=156924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emma Watson’s really big moment, the Dog Whisperer’s disappointing day, Pamela Anderson’s good deed’s too dirty]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/12/newsmakers-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Emma Watson’s really big moment, the Dog Whisperer’s disappointing day, Pamela Anderson’s good deed’s too dirty
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amid the chaos, a few kind words for the Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/10/kind-words-for-the-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/10/kind-words-for-the-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=156300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American electoral scene has been swamped by disillusionment]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/10/kind-words-for-the-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	The American electoral scene has been swamped by disillusionment
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey Obama—now what?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/05/mid-term-madness/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/05/mid-term-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mid-term elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=156343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What went wrong for the Democrats, what to expect now, and why Obama isn’t done yet]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/05/mid-term-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What went wrong for the Democrats, what to expect now, and why Obama isn’t done yet
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The progressive response (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/04/the-progressive-response-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/04/the-progressive-response-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex himelfarb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=156203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex Himelfarb considers how progressives can respond to anger.
Canadians deserve an alternative that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/04/the-progressive-response-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alex Himelfarb considers how progressives can respond to anger.
Canadians deserve an alternative that...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The progressive response</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/03/the-progressive-response/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/03/the-progressive-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Topp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=155990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Topp explains how the left should respond to what the right is currently...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/03/the-progressive-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Brian Topp explains how the left should respond to what the right is currently...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burning down the house</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/burning-down-the-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/burning-down-the-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Weinman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=152447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The move toward libertarianism is having extreme consequences, as one Tennessee homeowner discovered]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/burning-down-the-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The move toward libertarianism is having extreme consequences, as one Tennessee homeowner discovered
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsmakers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/15/newsmakers-42/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/15/newsmakers-42/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Privacy Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Paladino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China’s Got Talent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dmitry Medvedev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamid Karzai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India’s Commonwealth Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Jong Il]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelangelo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Campbel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renaissance art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland Yard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Satanic Verses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youngtown’s Facebook page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=152062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger has advice for Russia, Naomi Campbell’s unwitting good deed, and Kim Jong Il’s other son]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/15/newsmakers-42/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Arnold Schwarzenegger has advice for Russia, Naomi Campbell’s unwitting good deed, and Kim Jong Il’s other son
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sheriff Joe comes to tea</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/sheriff-joe-comes-to-tea/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/sheriff-joe-comes-to-tea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Arpaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=150867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arizona’s tough-talking cop is a Tea Party favourite, in spite of accusations of financial irregularities]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/sheriff-joe-comes-to-tea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Arizona’s tough-talking cop is a Tea Party favourite, in spite of accusations of financial irregularities
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where ideas are considered dangerous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/ideas-are-dangerous/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/ideas-are-dangerous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=149911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finance Minister Jim Flaherty was praised for rising above ideology]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/ideas-are-dangerous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Finance Minister Jim Flaherty was praised for rising above ideology
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The American character at work in post-Katrina New Orleans</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/27/the-american-character-at-work-in-post-katrina-new-orleans/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/27/the-american-character-at-work-in-post-katrina-new-orleans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground zero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katrina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=144413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been five years since the disastrous Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/27/the-american-character-at-work-in-post-katrina-new-orleans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It has been five years since the disastrous Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party—one year later</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/27/the-tea-party%e2%80%94one-year-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/27/the-tea-party%e2%80%94one-year-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=140371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The political landscape has changed dramatically since Obama's election]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/27/the-tea-party%e2%80%94one-year-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The political landscape has changed dramatically since Obama's election
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>America is angry</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/13/america-is-angry/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/13/america-is-angry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Köhler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Ayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardians of the Free Republics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Militias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States of America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=119182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crazed militias. Grassroots revolt. A capital at war. The country is tearing itself apart.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/13/america-is-angry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>181</slash:comments>
	Crazed militias. Grassroots revolt. A capital at war. The country is tearing itself apart.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How we talk about this</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/18/how-we-talk-about-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/18/how-we-talk-about-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Nagourney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Broder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Packer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=108978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George Packer considers the way we discuss this stuff.
Broder wasn’t analyzing Palin’s positions...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/18/how-we-talk-about-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
	George Packer considers the way we discuss this stuff.
Broder wasn’t analyzing Palin’s positions...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It takes a village to raise an idiot, He did it for the kids and Bad times for burkas</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/12/it-takes-a-village-to-raise-an-idiot-he-did-it-for-the-kids-and-bad-times-for-burkas/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/12/it-takes-a-village-to-raise-an-idiot-he-did-it-for-the-kids-and-bad-times-for-burkas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahab the A-rab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arcade Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Athis Mons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Grundy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biracial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bronze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheerleader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coquitlam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Manley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feng shui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[François Fillon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitarzan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Olympic Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Rogge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jairo Miguel Sànchez Alonso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joslyn James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kangaroo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katarina Witt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leila Ghannam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mentally challenged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Vit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Caldwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mistress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moroccan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Sarkozy’s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nina Wang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympic Village]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris hilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners in Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Duchesne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramallah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Régine Chassagne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rehabilitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robson Square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skating Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Illustrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiger woods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wake Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/12/it-takes-a-village-to-raise-an-idiot-he-did-it-for-the-kids-and-bad-times-for-burkas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Newsmakers
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Populism, tea parties, constitutions, climate change</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/09/populism-tea-parties-constitutions-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/09/populism-tea-parties-constitutions-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidiarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=100505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the U.S. face a period of indiscriminate populism in its political life? New...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/09/populism-tea-parties-constitutions-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
	Does the U.S. face a period of indiscriminate populism in its political life? New...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jimmy Carter is not the problem</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/17/jimmy-carter-is-not-the-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/17/jimmy-carter-is-not-the-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repulicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter stirred up controversy recently by saying Barack Obama&#8217;s opponents are primarily motivated...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/17/jimmy-carter-is-not-the-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
	Jimmy Carter stirred up controversy recently by saying Barack Obama&#8217;s opponents are primarily motivated...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
