<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Tom Flanagan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/tom-flanagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Land mines in our sexual landscape</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/23/land-mines-in-our-sexual-landscape/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/23/land-mines-in-our-sexual-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Thomson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steubenville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barbara Amiel on an anything-goes sexual society]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/23/land-mines-in-our-sexual-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Barbara Amiel on an anything-goes sexual society
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preston Manning suggests shutting up</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/preston-manning-suggests-shutting-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/preston-manning-suggests-shutting-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allan Hunsperger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manning conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preston Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=359321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Reform party leader's advice to conservatives]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/preston-manning-suggests-shutting-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The former Reform party leader's advice to conservatives
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preston Manning on the state of the conservative movement</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/09/the-state-of-the-conservative-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/09/the-state-of-the-conservative-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preston Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=358836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Reform leader addresses the Manning conference]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/09/the-state-of-the-conservative-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The former Reform leader addresses the Manning conference
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Flanagan on child pornography, the backlash and the worst week of his life</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/on-discussing-child-porn-the-backlash-and-the-worst-week-of-his-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/on-discussing-child-porn-the-backlash-and-the-worst-week-of-his-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backlash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What have you learned? Where do you go from here? Tom Flanagan takes questions from Anne Kingston ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/on-discussing-child-porn-the-backlash-and-the-worst-week-of-his-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What have you learned? Where do you go from here? Tom Flanagan takes questions from Anne Kingston 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Flanagan says he was trapped into child porn comments</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/tom-flanagan-says-he-was-trapped-into-child-porn-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/tom-flanagan-says-he-was-trapped-into-child-porn-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EDMONTON &#8211; A former high-level political strategist criticized for his comments on child pornography...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/tom-flanagan-says-he-was-trapped-into-child-porn-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	EDMONTON &#8211; A former high-level political strategist criticized for his comments on child pornography...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academics defend Flanagan&#8217;s child porn views</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/02/academics-defend-flanagans-child-porn-views-as-public-debate-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/02/academics-defend-flanagans-child-porn-views-as-public-debate-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 05:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CALGARY &#8211; Some academics are coming to the defence of former Stephen Harper strategist...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/02/academics-defend-flanagans-child-porn-views-as-public-debate-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	CALGARY &#8211; Some academics are coming to the defence of former Stephen Harper strategist...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Flanagan apologizes as MPs and CBC denounce his comments on child pornography</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/politicians-condemn-tom-flanagan-for-suggesting-child-porn-viewing-is-ok/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/politicians-condemn-tom-flanagan-for-suggesting-child-porn-viewing-is-ok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=355372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EDMONTON &#8211; Former Stephen Harper strategist Tom Flanagan has been widely and swiftly condemned...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/politicians-condemn-tom-flanagan-for-suggesting-child-porn-viewing-is-ok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	EDMONTON &#8211; Former Stephen Harper strategist Tom Flanagan has been widely and swiftly condemned...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can&#8217;t stop, won&#8217;t stop</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/10/cant-stop-wont-stop-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/10/cant-stop-wont-stop-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Comartin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=291907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hill Times sizes up the permanent campaign.
Prof. Flanagan, a political pundit who...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/10/cant-stop-wont-stop-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Hill Times sizes up the permanent campaign.
Prof. Flanagan, a political pundit who...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ba-a-a-attle for the Alberta voter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/28/ba-a-a-attle-for-the-alberta-voter/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/28/ba-a-a-attle-for-the-alberta-voter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 alberta election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta election law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta progressive conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alison redford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danielle Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ggplot2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gini coefficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildrose Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildrose party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=248726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The early days of the Alberta election showcase the Wildrose tacticians at their best]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/28/ba-a-a-attle-for-the-alberta-voter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The early days of the Alberta election showcase the Wildrose tacticians at their best
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A muddled Senate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/a-muddled-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/a-muddled-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Jedras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=219372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff Jedras notes Stephane Dion&#8217;s continued dissection of the Harper government&#8217;s Senate reforms, including...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/07/a-muddled-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	Jeff Jedras notes Stephane Dion&#8217;s continued dissection of the Harper government&#8217;s Senate reforms, including...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Persichilli le non-Québécois</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/02/persichilli-le-non-quebecois/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/02/persichilli-le-non-quebecois/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelo Persichilli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dimitri soudas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=212850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newest PMO hire suggests the Conservatives are turning their attention toward the great big ethnic stew pot of Toronto]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/02/persichilli-le-non-quebecois/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
	The newest PMO hire suggests the Conservatives are turning their attention toward the great big ethnic stew pot of Toronto
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political correctness gone mad?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/10/political-correctness-gone-mad/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/10/political-correctness-gone-mad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Derry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abella commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Equity Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racial discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visible minorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=207723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UN upbraids Canada for its use of the term ‘visible minority’]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/10/political-correctness-gone-mad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
	The UN upbraids Canada for its use of the term ‘visible minority’
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nycole Turmel disappoints Stephen Harper</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/04/nycole-turmel-disappoints-stephen-harper/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/04/nycole-turmel-disappoints-stephen-harper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denis Lebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxime Bernier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nycole Turmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=207444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister says he is profoundly saddened by Nycole Turmel&#8217;s associations with sovereignists....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/04/nycole-turmel-disappoints-stephen-harper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	The Prime Minister says he is profoundly saddened by Nycole Turmel&#8217;s associations with sovereignists....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two questions for Stephen Harper (III)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/20/two-questions-for-stephen-harper-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/20/two-questions-for-stephen-harper-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Desserud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=185837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After interviewing Mr. Layton and Mr. Ignatieff, Peter Mansbridge will sit down with Mr....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/20/two-questions-for-stephen-harper-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
	After interviewing Mr. Layton and Mr. Ignatieff, Peter Mansbridge will sit down with Mr....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two questions for Stephen Harper (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/two-questions-for-stephen-harper-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/two-questions-for-stephen-harper-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=181225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In light of what we saw and heard during the first week of the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/two-questions-for-stephen-harper-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
	In light of what we saw and heard during the first week of the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Stephen Harper was writing in 1997</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/what-stephen-harper-was-writing-in-1997/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/what-stephen-harper-was-writing-in-1997/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1997]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Milewski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=180460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terry Milewski digs up an essay penned by Stephen Harper and Tom Flanagan around...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/what-stephen-harper-was-writing-in-1997/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	Terry Milewski digs up an essay penned by Stephen Harper and Tom Flanagan around...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper and constitutional convention</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/29/stephen-harper-and-constitutional-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/29/stephen-harper-and-constitutional-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrienne Clarkson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Desserud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=179991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan, a former advisor to Mr. Harper, is asked for his opinion on...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/29/stephen-harper-and-constitutional-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
	Tom Flanagan, a former advisor to Mr. Harper, is asked for his opinion on...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How about &quot;Somewhat benign, but sort of an a-hole&quot;?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/31/how-about-somewhat-benign-but-sort-of-an-a-hole/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/31/how-about-somewhat-benign-but-sort-of-an-a-hole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 01:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benign dictatorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshall McLuhan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael behiels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ottawa citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=99456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Historian Michael Behiels commences his Citizen op-ed on the present constitutional emergency by describing...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/31/how-about-somewhat-benign-but-sort-of-an-a-hole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
	Historian Michael Behiels commences his Citizen op-ed on the present constitutional emergency by describing...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On second thought</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/12/on-second-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/12/on-second-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=91923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan talks to the Winnipeg Free Press about Michael Ignatieff, attack ads, the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/12/on-second-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
	Tom Flanagan talks to the Winnipeg Free Press about Michael Ignatieff, attack ads, the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great moments in candour (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/09/great-moments-in-candour-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/09/great-moments-in-candour-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=80545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP dispatches Charlie Angus, the party&#8217;s truthiness critic apparently, to comment on Tom...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/09/great-moments-in-candour-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
	The NDP dispatches Charlie Angus, the party&#8217;s truthiness critic apparently, to comment on Tom...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great moments in candour</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/09/great-moments-in-candour/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/09/great-moments-in-candour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=80413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan considers the Conservatives&#8217; intent to run against the specter of a Liberal-NDP-Bloc...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/09/great-moments-in-candour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
	Tom Flanagan considers the Conservatives&#8217; intent to run against the specter of a Liberal-NDP-Bloc...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The readable Harper</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/27/the-readable-harper/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/27/the-readable-harper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=78056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An unofficial collection of the PM’s freely available writings, for all your educational or objectionable purposes]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/27/the-readable-harper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
	An unofficial collection of the PM’s freely available writings, for all your educational or objectionable purposes
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of the Globe and Mail political strategists: Bruce Anderson defends dignity, civility, schoolgirls</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/14/battle-of-the-globe-and-mail-conservative-strategists-bruce-anderson-defends-dignity-civility-schoolgirls/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/14/battle-of-the-globe-and-mail-conservative-strategists-bruce-anderson-defends-dignity-civility-schoolgirls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no puffins were shot in the making of this rebuttal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white hot columnist-on-columnist action]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=70597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take that, Tom Flanagan &#8212; the high road, that is:
As a citizen who...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/14/battle-of-the-globe-and-mail-conservative-strategists-bruce-anderson-defends-dignity-civility-schoolgirls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
	Take that, Tom Flanagan &#8212; the high road, that is:
As a citizen who...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: General Canada</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/13/the-commons-general-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/13/the-commons-general-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Trebek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalton McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas MacArthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Bettman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stroumboulopoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monte Solberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preston Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Hillier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Hortons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=43303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hillier shares some of his wisdom—and a joke about George Stroumboulopoulos]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/13/the-commons-general-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	Hillier shares some of his wisdom—and a joke about George Stroumboulopoulos
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Middle-brow</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/05/middle-brow/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/05/middle-brow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick muttart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=33937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Canadian Press assessment of Patrick Muttart&#8217;s departure.
Muttart also overhauled the party&#8217;s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/05/middle-brow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
	From the Canadian Press assessment of Patrick Muttart&#8217;s departure.
Muttart also overhauled the party&#8217;s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Michael Ignatieff and the herd</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/04/the-commons-michael-ignatieff-and-the-herd/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/04/the-commons-michael-ignatieff-and-the-herd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denis coderre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Valeriote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Dryden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Raitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxime Bernier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre poilievre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=33619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The early reviews are in and Ignatieff is a disaster]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/04/the-commons-michael-ignatieff-and-the-herd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
	The early reviews are in and Ignatieff is a disaster
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;A bunch of self-serving exaggeration&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/13/a-bunch-of-self-serving-exaggeration/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/13/a-bunch-of-self-serving-exaggeration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=27577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canwest is presently running a five-part—only five?—series on the decline of our politics. The...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/13/a-bunch-of-self-serving-exaggeration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	Canwest is presently running a five-part—only five?—series on the decline of our politics. The...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The past and future tense</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/03/the-past-and-future-tense/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/03/the-past-and-future-tense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=22038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBC tonight referred to an essay—Our Benign Dictatorship—authored in 1996 by Stephen Harper and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/03/the-past-and-future-tense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	CBC tonight referred to an essay—Our Benign Dictatorship—authored in 1996 by Stephen Harper and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too much is never enough</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/28/too-much-is-never/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/28/too-much-is-never/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["And prone to squabbling they tend to fall apart very r]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=20833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four years ago I wrote about Tom Flanagan&#8217;s first book, Game Theory in Canadian...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/28/too-much-is-never/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
	Four years ago I wrote about Tom Flanagan&#8217;s first book, Game Theory in Canadian...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Chong Maverick Watch</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/15/michael-chong-maverick-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/15/michael-chong-maverick-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 20:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Chong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=17965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, this. Now, this.
An opinion piece published Friday in the Globe and Mail ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/15/michael-chong-maverick-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	First, this. Now, this.
An opinion piece published Friday in the Globe and Mail ...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;It&#039;s Australia on line one &#8230; something about royalties.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/09/30/its-australia-on-line-one-something-about-royalties/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/09/30/its-australia-on-line-one-something-about-royalties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[majorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the book that keeps on giving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=9953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]Stephen responded on 20 March with an eloquent speech in the House of Commons,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/09/30/its-australia-on-line-one-something-about-royalties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
	[...]Stephen responded on 20 March with an eloquent speech in the House of Commons,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megapundit: What Julie Couillard has to do with Mikhail Gorbachev</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/16/megapundit-what-julie-couillard-has-to-do-with-mikhail-gorbachev/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/16/megapundit-what-julie-couillard-has-to-do-with-mikhail-gorbachev/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>selley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Megapundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta human rights commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Lunn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health council of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[julie cuoillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kandahar jailbreak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisbon Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Steyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxime Bernier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mubin Shaikh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAFTA disasta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison break]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queer militia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential schools apology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Chayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarposa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Boisson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto 18]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=2067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>WEEKEND ROUNDUP</strong>
<strong>Must-reads: </strong>Scott Taylor on Afghan governance;<strong> </strong>Christie Blatchford, Rex Murphy and<strong> ...</strong>Daphne]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/16/megapundit-what-julie-couillard-has-to-do-with-mikhail-gorbachev/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<strong>WEEKEND ROUNDUP</strong>
<strong>Must-reads: </strong>Scott Taylor on Afghan governance;<strong> </strong>Christie Blatchford, Rex Murphy and<strong> ...</strong>Daphne
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only tangentially tape-related: Remember all that confusion over when the meeting took place?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/04/only-tangentially-tape-related-remember-all-that-confusion-over-when-the-meeting-took-place/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/04/only-tangentially-tape-related-remember-all-that-confusion-over-when-the-meeting-took-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ray novak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tale of the tape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick recap, in case you&#8217;ve forgotten: Dona Cadman told Zytaruk that she found...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/04/only-tangentially-tape-related-remember-all-that-confusion-over-when-the-meeting-took-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A quick recap, in case you&#8217;ve forgotten: Dona Cadman told Zytaruk that she found...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: So it goes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/03/12/the-commons-so-it-goes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/03/12/the-commons-so-it-goes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brenda Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Cadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean del Mastro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Dryden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxime Bernier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymonde Folco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryan sparrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Buckler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Russell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/12/the-commons-so-it-goes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives have no credible answers and the Liberals are now mocking them in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/03/12/the-commons-so-it-goes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservatives have no credible answers and the Liberals are now mocking them in...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
