<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; William Whatcott</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/william-whatcott/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Whatcott fallout: the Supreme Court upholds protections we don&#8217;t need</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/whatcott-fallout-the-supreme-court-upholds-protections-we-dont-need/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/whatcott-fallout-the-supreme-court-upholds-protections-we-dont-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Gillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Gillis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Whatcott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian tolerance is less fragile than courts and human rights bodies think]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/whatcott-fallout-the-supreme-court-upholds-protections-we-dont-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Canadian tolerance is less fragile than courts and human rights bodies think
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-gay flyers violated Saskatchewan rights code: Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/anti-gay-flyers-violated-saskatchewan-rights-code-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/anti-gay-flyers-violated-saskatchewan-rights-code-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Whatcott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; A Saskatchewan anti-gay crusader violated human rights rules when he distributed some...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/anti-gay-flyers-violated-saskatchewan-rights-code-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; A Saskatchewan anti-gay crusader violated human rights rules when he distributed some...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Whatcott case: Drawing a line between free speech and hate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/the-whatcott-case-drawing-a-line-between-free-speech-and-hate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/the-whatcott-case-drawing-a-line-between-free-speech-and-hate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saskatchewan Human Rights Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Whatcott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court struggles to find a compromise]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/the-whatcott-case-drawing-a-line-between-free-speech-and-hate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Supreme Court struggles to find a compromise
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatcott Decision: The implications extend far beyond one anti-gay crusader</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/whatcott-decision-will-the-supreme-court-get-human-rights-commissions-out-of-policing-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/whatcott-decision-will-the-supreme-court-get-human-rights-commissions-out-of-policing-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Gillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Whatcott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the Supreme Court get human rights commissions out of policing speech?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/whatcott-decision-will-the-supreme-court-get-human-rights-commissions-out-of-policing-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Will the Supreme Court get human rights commissions out of policing speech?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 13: How the battle for free speech was won</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/19/five-years-two-tribunals-a-raft-of-secret-hearings-a-supreme-court-challenge-how-the-battle-for-free-speech-was-won/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/19/five-years-two-tribunals-a-raft-of-secret-hearings-a-supreme-court-challenge-how-the-battle-for-free-speech-was-won/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Gillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alison redford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B'nai Brith Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill C-304]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Storseth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Islamic Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Lund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezra Levant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Steyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shirlene McGovern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Whatcott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=266796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five years, two tribunals, secret hearings, a court challenge and a turning point]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/19/five-years-two-tribunals-a-raft-of-secret-hearings-a-supreme-court-challenge-how-the-battle-for-free-speech-was-won/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Five years, two tribunals, secret hearings, a court challenge and a turning point
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
